Today we will ** a slightly "crossing" topic, which may attract criticism from some friends, but in order to satisfy the curiosity of another part of the friends, the author decided to "take risks" to nag.
In order to prevent misunderstanding, first of all, it must be stated that in the original work of "Water Margin", Lu Zhishen captured Fang La, and the plot of "Wu Song captured Fang with one arm" is a film and television work and folk tale derived from Water Margin.
Obviously, it was Fang La, who was captured by Lu Zhishen, why did the credit run to Wu Song's head?
Perhaps influenced by the Qing Dynasty folk opera "Qingche Wangfu Collection of Songs", the subsequent version of "Water Margin" mentions that "Wu Song was chased and killed by Fang La after breaking his arm, and met Lu Zhishen in the process of escaping.
Who Fang La was caught by is not particularly important. The original work of the Water Margin and the opera romance are clearly written, and it is even more difficult to verify whether Wu Song and Lu Zhishen were involved in the history.
The historical truth is revealed: Fang La was captured by the number one minister of the Northern Song Dynasty.
In fact, real historical records show that Fang La was captured by the number one minister Tong Guan in the last years of the Northern Song Dynasty.
In the film and television version that Water Margin fans like to see, after Wu Song grabbed Fang La with one arm, he witnessed the ** of the brothers with his own eyes, and completely recognized the true face of Song Jiang. In order to achieve the goal of Zhao'an, Song Jiang did not hesitate to lose the entire Liangshan. In addition, Lu Zhishen's death had a profound impact on Wu Song, which led to Wu Song's decision to become a monk in Liuhe Temple.
In order to show their concern for the heroes of Liangshan, the imperial court gave them ** Yulu. Since Wu Song had become a monk, he was no longer interested in his career, so the court rewarded him with 100,000 yuan. So, many friends are curious: What is the concept of 100,000 yuan, and how much is it equivalent to in 2021?
The origin of the ancient "guan" and the monetary value of 100,000 guan.
Xu Shen's literary work "Shuowen Jie Zi" of the Eastern Han Dynasty explains: "Qianbei is through. From、Bei。 Guanguan is a verb that has the meaning of penetrating, piercing;Bei means money. Taken together, the two translated, translated into the vernacular, referred to the rope that threaded money, which later evolved into a monetary unit of measurement.
In the official histories such as the Historical Records, the Hanshu, and the Zizhi Tongjian, as well as the Romance, the most commonly used measure word when mentioning money is "Guan". So, 100,000 is actually quite a lot.
Ancient Monetary Systems and Grain Value Conversion.
The background of the Water Margin is the end of the Northern Song Dynasty, although the year of Fang La's capture is not clear, but in history, Fang La was captured and killed by Tong Guan in the third year of Emperor Xuanhe of Song Hui (1121 AD). In order to understand the monetary value of 100,000 yuan, we need to sort out the ancient monetary system.
Previously, some authors converted copper coins into ** and then multiplied by the modern ** unit price, which was very wrong. Because gold and silver in ancient times were a kind of currency in their own right, they could be used directly to buy things, unlike in modern times, where gold and silver were mainly used as collectibles. It was only in the middle and late Ming Dynasty that ancient China officially listed ** as a common currency.
Fang La is worth 70 million: prices in real history have skyrocketed.
Taking into account the dynastic changes and currency changes in ancient societies, we find that people and food are the only ones that have not changed. In the seventh year of the reign of Emperor Xining of the Song Dynasty, it was stipulated that the above-grade rice was 1,000 guan per stone, and 1,000 guan money could buy 118 catties of grain.
In the Song Dynasty, one stone of rice was 925 Song Jin, according to the modern conversion is 118 city jin. If we take the price of Emperor Xuanhe of the Song Dynasty in the middle and late Song Dynasty, one stone of rice rises to 2,500 to 3,000 yuan. Therefore, 100,000 yuan is equivalent to about 64,750,000 to 77,700,000 yuan.
Although the exact value is difficult to determine, the bounty that Wu Song received from capturing Fang La was undoubtedly a huge fortune. During the Song Dynasty, ordinary people may not be able to accumulate so much even in a good agricultural environment. Taking Dong Mingzhu's annual salary as an example, Wu Song's bounty is more than 8 times Dong Zong's annual salary, which is indeed staggering.
Epilogue: The legendary story of wealth in the Water Margin.
The legendary story of Wu Song's capture of Fang La in the Water Margin, whether it is historical truth or ** opera, presents us with a wonderful picture of time and space. Such stories not only stimulate people's curiosity about history, but also show the wealth legend of ancient society. Perhaps, through this story, we can better understand the people and events of that era.
Water Margin: A legend of fortune through time and space.
This article presents a legendary picture of wealth intertwined in time and space by deeply analyzing the story of Wu Song's capture of Fang La in the Water Margin, as well as the conversion of the ancient monetary system and the value of grain. With clear logic and vivid narration, the author successfully leads the reader to think deeply about the interweaving of history, literature, and the concept of wealth.
First of all, the article provides readers with a comprehensive and clear background by clearly clarifying the role assignment of the captured heroes in the original and subsequent versions of Water Margin. This treatment shows the author's unique insight into the literary work, and at the same time arouses the reader's curiosity about the historical truth. The introduction of the traversal element makes the article more engaging and successfully stimulates the reader's interest in reading.
Secondly, the article provides an in-depth explanation of the origin of the ancient monetary unit of "guan" and the monetary value of 100,000 guan, showing the author's solid foundation in historical and cultural knowledge. Through a detailed analysis of the value of grain, the article skillfully links the ancient economic system with the modern concept of money, so that the reader can better understand the price level and wealth distribution in the historical period.
In the amount of bounty in ** Water Margin, the author used historical records and descriptions of soaring prices, so that readers could more intuitively feel the social turmoil and price fluctuations at that time. Such a detailed description not only makes the article more specific and vivid, but also enhances the reader's convincing ability to the authenticity of the story of the Water Margin.
Finally, the article concludes with "The Legendary Story of Wealth in the Water Margin", which cleverly summarizes the theme of the article. Through this, the reader is left with a deep impression of the story of the Water Margin at the end of the text, and the thoughts on history and wealth also echo in their hearts.
Overall, this review provides a comprehensive and in-depth interpretation of all aspects of the article, from the content to the structure, showing the author's deep understanding and grasp of the topic. By reading this article, readers can not only understand the details of the story of the Water Margin, but also think about how historical and literary works can trigger readers' thinking and imagination in different time and space.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!