Check in on the 346th day.
Both positive and negative biases are significant.
Comparing the "results" with the "expectations", if the results exceed expectations, it is a positive bias, and if the results are lower than expected, it is a negative bias. Negative bias is more concerned about the general public, after all, mistakes, setbacks, and failures are more sobering and impressive. In fact, both of these are significant in the review.
In the actual review, we often encounter such a situation: one thing is not done as a whole, and during the review, everyone is full of fire for the negative deviation, and the completed part of the matter is brushed aside. There is no doubt that everyone's honest and realistic attitude is particularly valuable, and everyone looks forward to clarifying and solving the problem through review, but focusing only on negative bias will bring two risks.
On the one hand, when talking about things that are not so good, the atmosphere is serious and depressing, and there are definitely very few people who are happy when they hear it. Especially when those who are stressed and worried are burdened with heavy ideological baggage, it is difficult to devote themselves to the review. When people connect with their strengths and strengths, they are less likely to be discouraged when they are frustrated, and they are more confident when faced with challenges. Therefore, we often recommend that you find the positive bias first, know what is done right, and make the atmosphere of the review slightly more positive. This means that the fundamental purpose of the review meeting is to get things straight, not just to make mistakes.