**Invite a third-party evaluation agency to conduct a satisfaction survey, and a unit requires the masses to reply "I know!" as soon as they receive **I'm satisfied!What do you think.
The answer to the question of this phenomenon is relatively simple, and the core is to talk about the impact and causes of the phenomenon described in the question stem, and put forward corresponding countermeasures, so that candidates can play according to their own accumulation.
Viewpoint Proposal] can directly express viewpoint, can be case + viewpoint.
Impact] can be used to analyze the impact on the **, the masses, and the unit, and the impact on the third-party evaluation agency can also be discussed.
The reason can be analyzed from the perspective of the subject or from the level, so I will not expand on them one by one.
Countermeasures] Targeted suggestions are sufficient.
Considering that the candidate's answer to the exam is about 2 minutes, the verbatim manuscript is pointed, and the content is slightly selected, and it can also be appropriately expanded, depending on your own accumulation.
Refer to Analysis 1].
*Conducting satisfaction surveys through third-party platforms focuses on understanding our experience and shortcomings in "serving the people" and "policy implementation" more accurately and objectively from the perspective of a third-party platform, so as to provide guidance for the next work. However, the practice of a certain unit in the question stem, with the answer of "I know, I am satisfied", will affect the authenticity of the survey data, and it is impossible to better understand the actual situation of grassroots work.
If the employer asks the public to reply according to the preset answers, it will also make the masses have a negative impression of the unit, thinking that the unit is dishonest or trying to cover up the problem, which will damage the image of the unit.
If the public answers the questions according to the preset answers of the unit, it will also make the investigation lose its impartiality and independence, and violate the ethics of the investigation.
On the one hand, it is necessary to innovate the form, not only limited to the first survey, but also to have more diversified research methods or feedback channels for the massesThe third-party evaluation agency also needs to adhere to professional ethics, conduct in-depth investigations, conduct professional evaluations, and find some problems that cannot be touched and dare not be disclosed by internal supervision, so as to make supervision more objective, independent and fair.
For our staff, we should firmly establish a sense of serving the people, consolidate responsibilities, and actively rectify and reform, so that the policy can be truly implemented and the masses can get more benefits. Only in this way can we truly get a satisfactory answer from the masses of the people.
The champion can be enrolled in school for 0 yuan, and the counterattack can also pay a part of it first, and then make up the fee. Accommodation is included throughout the journey.
In addition, my "The Way of Interviewing - Verbatim Script" is already available for appointment. It includes the real questions of the 2023 Shanxi Provincial Examination and public institutions, and analyzes them, and most of the questions are multiple solutions to one question. Welcome to consult and understand.