In the second half of 1951, the Chinese and North Korean allied forces confronted each other near the 38th parallel, and armistice negotiations began. In the context of seeking more favorable bargaining chips, the joint ** launched the summer and autumn offensive, and the Chinese and North Korean coalition forces were brave and tenacious, and successfully blocked the offensive. In the spring of 1952, the Chinese and North Korean coalition forces also launched a spring offensive, and in order to cope with the negotiation situation, the combined forces counterattacked.
The battle for the highlands in the midst of the war.
From the second half of 1951 to the first half of 1952, soldiers on both sides fought fiercely on the high ground near the 38th parallel. Among them, a small plateau, North Mountain of Seohyeon-dong, was nicknamed Pork Chop Mountain by the U.S. military because of its resemblance to pork chops, and became the focus of contention.
In June 1952, Major General David L. Ruuffler, commander of the U.S. 45th Division, carefully selected 11 tactical points, among which Mt. Pork Chop (North Mountain in Seohyeon-dong) was listed as the No. 10 target. The U.S. forces quickly occupied Pork Chop Hill and built fortifications in an attempt to hold their ground. However, this operation presented our 39th Division of the 117th Army with a difficult problem, the terrain of Pork Chop Mountain was steep, and it was sandwiched between the two enemy-occupied high grounds, which was difficult to hold. Faced with the dilemma, the 117th Division developed a unique operational policy - "bloodletting tactics".
Bloodletting tactics".
The bloodletting tactic "emphasizes fighting without occupying, attacking without defending, and evacuating after a quick victory." Fight continuously, fight repeatedly, look for fighters, and take turns to participate in the battle, so as to achieve the goal of preserving oneself and destroying the enemy's living forces. Under this tactic, the 117th Division successfully carried out many strikes against the U.S. army, making Pork Chop Hill an important source of the U.S. army.
According to the characteristics of the US military, when it loses a first-level position, it will generally launch a counterattack at the company or battalion level. The main goal of our army is these counterattacking American troops, annihilating them with infantry ** and artillery support when the enemy leaves their fortifications and countercharges our troops. The core of this tactic is to force the US military to abandon its motorized mechanized equipment and conduct infantry and mountain offensive and defensive operations on the mountain battlefield.
Seven attacks on Pork Chop Mountain.
In the battle for the highlands of Pork Chop Mountain, there was a small highland where the two sides fought for more than 200 days, and changed hands seven times, and the two sides were huge. This small plateau is the North Mountain of Sekhyeon-dong, with an altitude of 2812 meters, because of its resemblance to pork chops, it was nicknamed Pork Chop Mountain by the U.S. military.
On July 6, 1953, as the dust was about to settle on the armistice negotiations, the 23rd Army decided to occupy Beishan. To this end, they mobilized all their strength and carried out a thrilling battle. In the seven-day battle, the volunteers not only annihilated more than 3,500 enemies, but also more than 1,800 themselves, but also made Pork Chop Mountain an unhealable wound for the U.S. military.
The final decisive battle and the arrival of victory.
The U.S. 7th Division strengthened the defense of "Pork Chop Mountain" and was determined to hold this high ground to the death. However, under the strong offensive of the volunteers, they were never able to succeed. The battle, which began on July 6 and lasted until July 12, the 23rd Army destroyed more than 3,500 enemies and more than 1,800 of its own. In the end, Trudeau Division Commander was forced to report to Bruce Clark, commander of the U.S. First Army, that the U.S. 7th Division was so heavy that it was no longer possible to recapture Pork Chop Hill. After consulting with Clark and Trudeau, Taylor, commander of the US 8th Army, decided to withdraw from the battle and make concessions to the "bloodletting tactics" of the Volunteer Army.
In 1953, Mark Clark, who signed the armistice, said: "Some so-called military experts say that during my tenure of office, only limited force will be used, there is no need to expand the scale of the war, and at all times victory will be ours." We never had enough troops, while the enemy enjoyed a great deal of strength that could not only stop our offensive, but also take small victories. ”
Eventually, the Korean War ended, and Pork Chop Mountain became a symbol of victory in bloodletting tactics. This battle for the heights is not only of great military significance, but also demonstrates our army's ability to respond flexibly and skillfully use tactics at the tactical level.
The article provides an exhaustive description of a fierce and brutal battle for the heights that took place on the Korean battlefield, highlighting the ingenious application of the unique tactic employed by the Chinese and North Korean coalition forces, the "bloodletting tactic". In this battle, the North Mountain of Seohyeon-dong became the focus, and was nicknamed Pork Chop Mountain by the U.S. Army, and the battle lasted for more than 200 days, and the two sides changed hands seven times, resulting in a huge ** on both sides.
First of all, the article vividly depicts the fierce scenes on the battlefield, bringing the reader into the combat environment of the time. Through a detailed description of the geographical environment and the deployment of the army, it is easier for readers to understand the tension and cruelty of the battle situation. In particular, the steep terrain of Pork Chop Mountain, sandwiched between the two enemy-occupied high grounds, has become a key place that is difficult to attack and defend, adding a lot of strategic variables to the entire battle situation.
Secondly, the article provides an in-depth analysis of the "bloodletting tactic" and emphasizes its uniqueness. This tactic highlights the idea of fighting without occupying and attacking without defending, as well as flexible tactical means such as continuous combat, repeated contention, and searching for fighters. This flexible and varied tactic was successfully applied in the Battle of Pork Chop Hill, which made people marvel at the command strategy of the Sino-Korean coalition forces.
The article also emphasizes the process of attacking Pork Chop Mountain seven times, each of which is a life-and-death struggle, and both sides have paid a huge price for this small mountain bag. These detailed details of the battle make people feel the cruelty of the war and the bravery of the soldiers. In particular, the clever use of the "bloodletting tactics" mentioned in the article in this process successfully annihilated a large number of living forces and achieved a tactical victory by forcing the enemy to abandon mechanized equipment.
Finally, the article expresses the final victory of this "bloodletting tactic" through the final results of the battle. Although the battle for Pork Chop Hill caused both sides to suffer a huge amount of **, the Chinese and North Korean coalition forces finally won the war through this tactic. This also reflects that in military warfare, the clever use of tactics and flexibility can often change the tide of battle and achieve final victory.
Overall, the article vividly depicts a thrilling battle on the Korean battlefield through detailed battle details and an in-depth analysis of "bloodletting tactics". Readers can deeply feel the cruelty of the war and the wisdom of the army commander in reading, which makes the historical picture of the entire battle vivid.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!