Swordsman Walker Three Musketeers.
Wen Swordsman Walker
Title Diagram Datang
Edited by Xiaochen
What?Retired servicemen rely on casting lots to arrange their work
Today's comrades-in-arms turned a Douyin short**, I don't know if I don't see it, I was shocked when I saw it!
At first, the swordsman thought it was who p, but it turned out that there was a ** truth!
Although it was very angry and explosive at first glance, a closer look revealed a lot of suspicious points-
According to the five elements of news: time, place, people, events, and reasons, there is no valid information except for a monogram and a venue.
Moreover, the expression "distribution of retired soldiers" in the monogram is also extremely irregular.
Sure enough, when we opened the review page, we didn't find any more valid information. But the comments of netizens went in a direction that should not ......
Judging by common sense, this is a "harmful message" that has no formal ***.
It is not known what the author's purpose is for publishing this information, but it is certain that the author deliberately omitted some key information. For example, this is the assignment of work for veterans
Just when we were about to follow up and verify further, we found that the original author had processed **.
Today's retired soldiers are the tomorrow of soldiers. Moreover, resettlement and distribution itself is a very serious matter, and whether it can be fair and just is related to the vital interests of the retired servicemen. As many people have said, decommissioning placement is the best conscription advertisement.
Regardless of whether there is anything in the ** or not, it is inappropriate and unserious to appear in the "allocation of lots".
Of course, a word of caution for everyone
First, there can't be no news without a head or tail, without a formal source of information. Because, these messages often hide the most critical information, and it is easy to mislead netizens who lack the ability to identify.
Second, for the information of the network self-first, it is necessary to have a certain ability to identify. Especially for information that clearly violates common sense, keep your eyes peeled and ask a few more whys
At present, whether it is the transfer and placement of officers or the arrangement of work by retired soldiers, there is no such thing as "distribution", and whether it is the transfer and placement of officers or the selection of posts arranged by retired soldiers by **, there are standardized operating procedures to ensure fairness, justice and openness, and there can be no problem of selecting posts by drawing lots.
The only possibility is that this assignment of retired servicemen is not a normal selection of posts when officers are transferred to other jobs and sergeants are arranged by **. It is the internal work arrangement of some enterprises or localities outside the normal resettlement channels prescribed by the state.
In other words, the only thing that makes sense is that this is an autonomous act of a place or enterprise.
The reason is simple—
The normal resettlement of retired servicemen cannot be selected by drawing lots alone!
The Measures for the Quantitative Scoring of the Performance of Retired Non-commissioned Officers and Conscripts on Active Duty in the Arrangement of Work clearly stipulates that the quantitative scoring of the performance of retired non-commissioned officers and conscripts on active duty as used in these Measures refers to the quantitative scoring of the performance of retired non-commissioned officers and conscripts on active duty, their combat performance during active service, the level of training and preparation, the number of years of active service, the degree of hardship in the area of active service, the appointment (acting) of special posts, the level of disability and related status, etc., in accordance with the unified standards, as the main basis for arranging work, and promoting the suitability of personnel and posts.
No place or unit, in theory or in reality, is willing to take such a risk or have any motivation to do such a stupid thing.
Here, I also hope that the author of the release ** can come forward to clarify and give you the truth.
(Related**, network, thanks here!.)）