In the re-examination of graduate students, beware of the following answers that anger the supervisor, and "tell the truth" should be considered carefully
In the trend of postgraduate entrance examinations, the biggest difference from the college entrance examination is that there is a re-examination link. This is because the training of master's and doctoral students has different standards than undergraduates, and higher requirements are put forward for comprehensive literacy. However, many students are accustomed to the exams on the examination papers, but do not pay enough attention to the face-to-face re-examination. Especially those candidates who have good written test scores are more likely to fall into the mistake of thinking that their strength is strong enough and that the retest is just a formality.
This was a serious misunderstanding, and one of the author's old classmates lost the first opportunity to go ashore until he retook the exam the following year. In the re-examination, there are some answering skills that students need to know by heart.
Excessive complaints about previous majors or colleges.
Many students choose to take postgraduate studies across majors or colleges to express their dissatisfaction with their previous choices and seek a better direction of study. However, when answering questions from your supervisor, don't complain too much about your previous major or institution. It's okay to mention your shortcomings in moderation, but excessive complaining may lead your advisor to think that you may regret it after grad school.
I went to graduate school because I couldn't find a good job.
One of the main reasons why many students go to graduate school is that they can't find their dream job. Although this is a common occurrence of a sluggish employment environment, being open in front of your supervisor for this reason may make you wonder if you will take your research seriously. It can be answered skillfully, emphasizing that graduate students can accept new training models, improve knowledge structure and ability, and be more conducive to career development.
I applied to the school because of the low difficulty.
In recent years, the difficulty of the graduate exam has gradually increased, and some candidates may choose to apply "downward" to increase the probability of admission. However, if you directly state in front of your tutor that you are applying to the school because of the low difficulty, it may be seen as showing off your superiority, and the other party may think that not admitting you is their loss. In responses, it is possible to subtly avoid direct references to difficulty and instead emphasize recognition of the school's unique nurturing environment and resources.
Definitely not considering a PhD.
Many students are still not familiar with postgraduate education, and in the re-examination, the supervisor may pay attention to whether the candidate is willing to continue to study for a doctorate. When answering this question, it's best not to be too categorical. If the mentor is very concerned about this issue, being too firm may lead to elimination. But at the same time, don't be too rash in committing to a PhD, lest you fail to fulfill your promise and cause problems.
Tutors have different styles and how candidates can ensure that they are recognized.
Tutors have different styles in the re-examination, so candidates should keep a low profile rather than deliberately performing to impress. Although some tutors prefer students with active minds, in general, they prefer to recruit people who are steady and practical. In addition to the professional level, the supervisor also preliminarily judges the candidate's learning attitude and whether he can complete the research task by examining his words and deeds and answering questions.
Overly eye-catching performance may make tutors worry about being difficult to manage, while overconfident students may question the way tutors teach and manage. Therefore, maintaining a low-key and steady attitude is more conducive to success.
In addition, candidates should be aware that the instructor's attitude on the spot may not be directly related to the re-examination result. The enthusiasm and happiness of the mentor are not the only criteria that determine the probability of going ashore. Some tutors are more interested in candidates from a personal point of view, and will still judge the actual performance when grading.
Finally, candidates should remain serious and relaxed during the re-examination process and show their daily selves. Ensure basic emotional intelligence when answering questions, avoid being overconfident in front of your mentor, and think in a more complex way that is no longer as simple as it was in childhood.
【Topic】Do you have any skills?