Recently, a complaint about the relocation of housing in Poly Mingyue Chenguang Community in Huadu District, Guangzhou has aroused widespread concern. Ms. Zhu and other 30 owners were originally employees of Huadu Food Industry Development, and in response to the city's old reform policy, they agreed to demolish the original commercial housing and move back in situ. However, when they viewed the property in August 2022, they found that the size of the relocated home did not meet the contractual standards, and the developer had taken a questionable approach.
In this relocation housing dispute, 30 owners were involved, who were originally employees of Huadu Food Industry Development. In 2018, in response to the urban renewal policy, they signed a contract with the relevant departments of Huadu District, agreeing to move the original commercial housing back to the 7-16 floors of Building 1 of Poly Mingyue Chenguang Community. According to the contract, the relocation house is divided into two specifications, one of which has a usable area of not less than 80 square meters, a total of 10 sets;The other set has a usable area of not less than 70 square meters, a total of 20 sets. However, when they viewed the property in August 2022, they found that the developer was "miraculously operating".
The public elevator on the floor plan was sealed and turned into a corridor for the relocated house. First, they found that the small balcony of the relocation house was enclosed and turned into a "mini room". These small balconies were supposed to be open balconies, and this was true on both the construction and as-built drawings. However, in order to achieve the size of the relocated houses agreed in the contract, the developer closed the walls of these small balconies and converted them into rooms. As a result, the already small house becomes even more cramped.
What's even more surprising is that the developer has also closed the elevator in the middle of the relocation house and moved the entrance door outward. In this way, the original elevator hall is included in the usable area of the suite, and the elevator does not stay on the 7th to 16th floors. This makes the entrance corridor of the relocated house longer, and the use value is greatly reduced. Previously, the developer had claimed that the building was "three ladders and four households", but the relocation house was actually "two ladders and four households". This has brought great inconvenience and safety hazards to the owners of the relocated houses.
Ms. Zhu and other owners said they could not accept these practices of the developer. They believe that the developer's actions have seriously violated the rights and interests of the owners and violated the contract. As a result, Ms. Zhu and other owners complained to the relevant departments, hoping that the problem could be properly resolved.
Regarding the owner's complaints, the relevant staff of the Huadu District Land Development and Reserve Center attached great importance to them. After communication and negotiation, the developer has agreed to open the closed elevator. However, further negotiations are still needed on how to compensate for the insufficient area. The staff member said that the matter will be dealt with as soon as possible to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the owners.
This incident has aroused widespread concern and heated discussions. Many people expressed dissatisfaction with the developer's actions, believing that their actions seriously violated the rights and interests of property owners. At the same time, it has also aroused the thinking of the urban reform policy and the attention to the problem of demolition and resettlement. It is hoped that through this incident, the relevant departments can strengthen supervision to protect the rights and interests of property owners, so that the urban renovation work can truly benefit the people.
In this case, it is not difficult to find various misdeeds of the developer in dealing with the problem of relocated housing. From the closure and transformation of small balconies to the closure of elevators, the removal of entrance doors to the compensation of insufficient area, it has brought a lot of troubles and inconveniences to the owners of the relocated houses. At the same time, it also exposed the negligence of the regulatory authorities in the review and control and the imperfection of the demolition and resettlement policy. 100 help plan
The developer's act of enclosing and renovating the small balcony is a clear violation of the contract and relevant laws and regulations. This not only brings an additional financial burden to the owners of the relocated houses, but also seriously affects their living quality and use functions. This kind of behavior fully exposes the non-standard and irresponsible attitude of developers in project management, and it is necessary to seriously investigate their responsibilities and strengthen supervision to prevent the recurrence of similar problems.
The developer's practice of closing the elevator and moving the entrance door out has also brought great inconvenience and safety hazards to the owners of the relocated houses. The original design of "three ladders and four households" has now become "two ladders and four households", which makes it extremely inconvenient for owners to travel, and also brings safety hazards to high-rise residents. This behavior fully exposes the unprofessional and irresponsible attitude of the developer in the planning and design, and it is necessary to strengthen the review and management of its qualifications and credibility to ensure the quality and safety of the project.
The issue of compensation for the insufficient area still needs to be further negotiated by both parties, which brings more uncertainty and pressure to the owners. If the issue of compensation is not properly resolved, it will have a long-term impact and distress on the lives of the owners, and will also seriously damage their interests and social stability. Therefore, the relevant departments need to intervene and coordinate the resolution of this matter as soon as possible to ensure that the legitimate rights and interests of the owners are protected and the social stability and harmonious development of society is maintained.
This incident fully exposed the irregularities and unprofessionalism of developers in project management and the negligence of regulatory authorities in auditing and control, and also reminded us to strengthen our thinking about urban renewal policies and pay attention to demolition and resettlement issues, so as to ensure the quality and safety of the project and maintain social stability and harmonious development. It is hoped that through this incident, we can attract the attention of relevant departments and the wide attention of all sectors of society, and jointly promote the solution of problems and social progress