Daughters-in-law accounted for more than half of the people who came to serve in the hospital. Since the new marriage law was introduced, it is difficult to see daughters-in-law serving their parents-in-law in hospitals.
The new marriage law clearly states that it is the duty of sons and daughters to serve their parents, and does not mention daughters-in-law.
I don't understand, although my mother-in-law and father-in-law did not give birth to a daughter-in-law, but I gave my daughter-in-law no less than my daughter-in-law, why did my daughter-in-law not have the obligation to take care of my mother-in-law and father-in-law?
If you get married and build a new house, your daughter-in-law will not have to worry about housing for many years, and you will not have to pay for housing. Mother-in-law and father-in-law take care of children for their daughter-in-law, so that their daughter-in-law can go to work without worries like a girl, and it will take more than ten years to raise a child. The mother-in-law cooks for the daughter-in-law, and the daughter-in-law can eat ready-made meals when she enters the door, without having to pay for it herself, buying vegetables by herself, and cooking by herself.
My mother-in-law and father-in-law have taken care of my daughter-in-law for decades, but when I am old, I can't move, and my daughter-in-law is justifiably not serving, and the law still supports my daughter-in-law's practice, I really can't understand why.
The mother-in-law and father-in-law are old, and the daughter-in-law does not care, which should be condemned morally and legally.
Isn't it?