At the end of last month, I had a ** on the situation after the San Francisco meeting, and wrote several texts to interpret the follow-up situation, including one "Under the Great Changes: China Needs a Big Pattern and a Big Strategy in order to Usher in the National Fortune Again", and now from the perspective of the situation, it is basically consistent with the previous **.
Biden's posture in San Francisco was very low, and at that time he felt that there must be something wrong with it, and some of the things that are happening now will be logically compared with the meeting in San Francisco last month.
The first is to sing the decline of China. The three major U.S. rating agencies have made some data and once again sang about China, which makes people feel ridiculous. No one believes in this kind of institution that is manipulated by the United States.
In the eyes of the outside world, these rating agencies have also pointed out the United States, which is actually a show, making the outside world think that they are very fair, and in fact they are American tools.
The second is Japan's interest rate hike. When the United States finishes adding, Japan will also add it, and the United States and Japan cooperate very tacitly. Japan is helping the United States to carry out a "financial sneak attack", and an even more brutal "financial war" is about to happenGo without saying.
The third is decoupling and chain breaking. The implementation of decoupling and chain breaking in the United States has accelerated, and Raimondo participated in the national defense seminar, and actually continued to clamore for a ban on advanced chips from China. It is said that Nvidia's castrated chips are also not allowed to be sold in China.
There is also a strange phenomenon, India's GDP suddenly skyrocketed, and it was easy to sit in the fifth place, and there are still people **, India's "Ben San" is no problem.
Why talk about "decoupling and breaking the chain", by the way, India?
Because the United States is building India into an alternative to China, the United States has shifted the industrial chain to India, most notably Apple's mobile phone. Apple's share of production has been withdrawn from China, and the future use of Apple mobile phones is all made in India.
From the above three things, it can be seen that the United States has been carrying out containment of China step by step and has not stopped. Where are those who used to shout "Sino-US friendship" gone?
Every step taken by the United States against China is compact, and it is clear that it has been designed and implemented gradually.
In particular, the United States has stepped up its efforts to make India a "substitute country."
The three major rating agencies have sung down China, effectively siphoning out China's foreign investment once again. The United States has manipulated these rating agencies and has spread rumors and smeared China on more than one occasion.
It is estimated that after this decline, there will be changes in foreign-funded enterprises.
It is impossible to control what should go, and several companies in the United States have already withdrawn, and Shell is gradually withdrawing.
Why did Japan's "financial sneak attack" choose to fight at this time?
In addition to cooperating with the United States, Japan is also interested in solving its own problems. But this suddenness was expected before, but no one cared, and now the online media are beginning to realize the seriousness of the problem.
As I have specifically talked about Japan's interest rate hike, Japan's quiet implementation does not rule out that we have internal ghosts colluding with it internally and externally. The aim is not to attract more people's attention, to numb China, and then to harvest China.
At present, the Kazakh-Israeli conflict is still ongoing, and the Russian-Ukrainian conflict has not stopped. After Japan's "interest rate hike", the United States may add another wave.
In the face of the United States' suppression and containment of China, as long as China survives, the United States will only have to build India as a "substitute country".
According to some sources, India's economy is indeed growing by leaps and bounds.
It is not surprising that India's sudden growth in national power has taken advantage of the dividends supported by the United States and Western countries.
The United States chose the alternative country, chose and chosen, and eventually abandoned Vietnam in favor of India. It is no wonder that Vietnam's GDP has dropped this time, and another country is Mexico.
Some people will say, can India hold up the position of "surrogate country"?
Not to mention, in the midst of global geopolitical conflicts, India is the most comfortable. In addition to the support of the United States, Russia has also continued to help India, although there is a little episode between Russia and India, but it does not prevent Russia from continuing to support India, of course, India will also earn a lot of energy price difference from Russia.
During the Russia-Ukraine conflict, India bought oil from Russia at a low price and sold it to European countries, making huge profits.
China has also helped India, and our mobile phone bigwigs have been deployed in India, and some have been fined hundreds of millions of dollars, and they have also "deeply cultivated India", which is really strange.
There is also a domestic company that helps India build a chemical plant, and it is said that after the completion of the project, the urea produced in India will directly compete for the Chinese market.
Although Indians are inefficient, the United States has no country to choose from, and only India can balance China in terms of geographical location and national strength.
It is only a matter of time before India "sits on five and runs three", but during this period, India will play with the United States, and India will be able to achieve this if there is no war with a big country.
When India completes its role as a "substitute country", the United States will complete the "decoupling and breaking the chain" with China, and the United States will have a comprehensive showdown with China
Obviously, the United States is pursuing this goal, but the completion of decoupling and breaking the chain and a comprehensive blockade of China will actually isolate China, and the United States will definitely have the means of war in the future.
Will the United States fight it personally?
Judging from the "experience" of the United States, during the Soviet period, the United States continued to disintegrate the Soviet Union and eventually collapsed the Soviet Union.
In the face of a military power, it is very small for the United States to directly launch a war, and it is possible to directly bring down China through a war of the first people, or like the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Some big Vs believe that in order to delay the United States' attack on China, China should restrict India's development, and our domestic investment in India, whether state-owned or private, our country should consider it as a whole, and cannot "selflessly help" India's development, especially industrial development.
Some domestic enterprises went to India to develop with the original purpose of making money. The money is definitely made, but there is also a risk of being cheated by India. No wonder some say that India is the "graveyard of foreign investors". Except, however, in the United States.
The purpose of our investment in India is to make money, but we should not invest in technologies and products that involve the country's core industries. It is documented that we also helped India to land on the moon and sold some technology and products to India. Because it is impossible for India to buy these cutting-edge technologies from Western countries.
As for the issue of helping India to industrialize, we still don't want to do it, and whoever wants to help can help, and if China continues to help, it may help a strong opponent.
It is only a matter of time before India becomes an "alternative country", although it is limited by objective conditions and ethnic characteristics.
We are more concerned about China's own security, and we should not think that the United States will wait for India to become a "substitute country" before attacking China. The "alternative country" is not only India, but also other countries, after all, a country like India, this year's GDP is inflated, and after wringing out the water, India really has not many industries.
India has a long way to go to truly "replace" China. As long as we don't help, the United States and the West will invest in India, which will also be a buffer for us.
Now we should be most vigilant about what happens in the process of "decoupling and breaking the chain" of the United States, which we used to call "boiling", believing that as long as we survive this period of time, we will be able to withstand the suppression and containment of the United States.
Looking at it now, although the United States has weakened somewhat, the advantages that the United States has built up over the past few decades can still play a role. I am afraid that the United States will not let us "boil" and will take a multi-pronged approach to suppress and contain us.
When we are uncomfortable, there will inevitably be some situations in the country, and if the United States takes the opportunity to fan the flames at this time, and then let the internal ghosts lead the rhythm, any unexpected situation may occur.
Now let's look at the term "stormy waves", not only to deal with foreign countries, but also to deal with some domestic "internal ghosts".
In addition to preparing for military struggle, we have actually carried out response work, including further opening up and exempting some countries from visas.
In response to many counterattacks, we also need to take the initiative, and don't be too kind-hearted, and don't deal with international games with traditional Chinese thinking, which is easy to lose.
In the game between countries, we should clearly see the nature of the people, there is no need to be kind to them, we should take precautions, and take the initiative to divert the enemy's attention elsewhere, only in this way can we deal with them effectively.
Imperialism and all reactionaries are paper tigers, it's not a big deal, it's difficult for us, it's hard for the whole world. Just like the comprehensive maximum sanctions imposed by the United States on Russia, not only did it fail in the end, but now it has formed a backlash against Western countries.
Internet, the copyright belongs to the original author.