In the age of the Internet, the avatar of a personal account has become a representation of people online. An avatar is like a person's name, capable of showcasing the individual's characteristics and personality. However, avatars do not serve as a criterion for judging a person. It is true that using different avatars can represent different personalities and preferences, but it does not represent the whole story. However, a male teacher went so far as to label parents through their profile pictures, which sparked public outrage.
Expansion: With the advent of the Internet era, avatars have become an important representative of people on the Internet. An avatar, like a person's name, is the first identifier of an individual in the virtual world. It is not only a person's "business card", but also a symbol of one's character, behavior, and hobbies. We can understand some of a person's characteristics and personality through his avatar. However, it is important to note that an avatar is only a part of an individual and cannot fully represent the whole of a person. Therefore, we should not judge a person based on their avatar alone. However, a male teacher tagged parents with their profile pictures in the parent group, which caused public outrage.
The male teacher labeled the parents through their avatars, with a clear subjective bias. He commented on different types of parents with a mocking and unkind attitude. He thinks that parents who use ** beautiful avatars love stinky beauty and actually look very average;He is least interested in parents who use memes and funny** as avatars;He believes that most of the female patriarchs who use illustrated back avatars are from within the system and are not easy to accessHe connects parents who use cute avatars with the elements of fortune with wealthy families;He believes that parents who use celebrity avatars are tantamount to nymphomaniacs;He described the parents who use small animal heads with good painting style and texture as having simple personalities. And the only ones who were praised by the male teacher were the parents who used landscape photos as avatars, they gave people a feeling of being out of contention, having a larger pattern, and having fewer things.
Expanding: The male teacher judged and labeled the parents through their avatars, revealing a clear subjective bias. He has a critical and sarcastic attitude towards different types of parents. He believes that the parents who use the ** beauty avatar are vain, but the actual appearance is very ordinary, this evaluation is not only biased, but also ignores the unique understanding of beauty. For parents who use emojis and funny** as avatars, he made it clear that he is not interested in them, which is undoubtedly a mockery and contempt for personal interests. He always associates female patriarchs with people in the system who use illustrated figures' backs, and this prejudice leads to unfair treatment of such parents. The subjective bias of using a cute avatar that uses the element of fortune and associates it with wealthy families is not only a speculation about personal wealth, but also limits the true understanding of such parents. As for parents who use celebrity avatars, he simply sees them as chasing celebrities in vain. And the parents who use small animal heads with good painting style and texture are called by him to have a simple personality, which is obviously superficial and one-sided. Only those parents who use landscape photos as avatars can be praised by him, and this prejudice is not only unfair to other parents, but also reflects his narrow-mindedness in personal aesthetics.
The male teacher's behavior caused dissatisfaction and anger among netizens. His judgments and labels are too subjective and one-sided, ignoring the individual differences and diversity of parents. Many netizens said they didn't understand why he commented on his parents' avatars in this way, and even asked him if he had ever been offended by these parents. His judgment made netizens feel offended, feeling that his opinion on parents was too subjective and one-sided, without any basis and basis. Netizens questioned whether it was appropriate and fair for him to label parents in this way, arguing that his behavior was inappropriate and impolite. Some netizens even ridiculed him: **Did the avatar provoke you?The incident sparked a public debate about teachers' professional ethics and educational equity.
Expanding: The unfair judgment of male teachers and the labeling of parents have caused strong public dissatisfaction and anger. His behavior was considered extremely subjective and one-sided, ignoring the differences and diversity of parents. Many members of the public were baffled by his behaviour and could not understand why he had treated his parents' avatars in this way, freely expressing his opinions, and questioning whether he had ever been offended by these parents. His judgment offended the public, who felt that his views on parents were too subjective and one-sided, without any basis or basis. The public questioned whether it was appropriate and fair for him to label parents in this way, believing that his behaviour was inappropriate and impolite. Some members of the public laughed at his behavior: Could it be that the ** avatar provoked you to provoke you?The incident sparked a public debate about teachers' professional ethics and educational equity.