The 2023 review stage of the materials for the application of primary and secondary school teacher titles has begun, and many teachers have questions about the term "approved by the review committee of senior primary and secondary school teachers" displayed on the platform. They wanted to know if that meant their application had been reviewed. To answer this question, we need to first understand the whole process of teacher title evaluation. This article will introduce the various stages of applying for teacher titles in detail and answer teachers' questions about the evaluation results.
The first step in the evaluation of teacher titles is the individual declaration. In the application stage, teachers need to prepare the corresponding materials and submit them to the review platform. These materials include resumes, teaching achievements, scientific research achievements, teaching evaluations, etc. After the individual declaration is completed, the next stage is moved.
Expansion: Individual declaration is the first step in the evaluation of teachers' professional titles, and it is also an important opportunity for teachers to show their teaching and scientific research achievements. In the individual declaration, teachers need to list their teaching achievements in detail, including teaching cases, student evaluations, teaching reforms, etc. At the same time, you also need to introduce your contributions in the field of scientific research, such as published **, participated in scientific research projects, etc. This step is an important part of the teacher's presentation to the review committee about their teaching strength and academic standards. Teachers need to prepare carefully and reflect their uniqueness in order to stand out in subsequent evaluations.
After the individual declaration is completed, the materials will be recommended by the school. The school will review the teachers' application materials and recommend qualified teachers to enter the next stage according to certain standards and regulations. School recommendations are a very important part of the review process, which can provide more endorsement and support for teachers' declarations.
Expansion: School recommendations are an important part of the review process, which provides more endorsement and support for teachers' declarations. In the school recommendation stage, the school will carefully evaluate the teacher's application materials and make a recommendation decision based on the teacher's teaching and research performance in the school. The significance of the school recommendation is that it can further verify the teaching strength and academic level of teachers, and add an authoritative recognition to the teacher's declaration. Therefore, teachers need to work hard to prepare materials during the individual application stage in order to obtain recommendations from the school and provide more opportunities for subsequent evaluations.
After the individual application and school recommendation are completed, the teacher's materials will enter the qualification and material review stage. This stage is a step-by-step review process, including six levels of audit, including the school, the county education and sports bureau, the county human resources and social security bureau, the municipal education bureau, the municipal human resources and social security bureau and the title review committee. Each level of review will carefully review the teacher's application materials, and if the materials are found to be inappropriate or unqualified, the teacher will be asked to revise and resubmit them for review.
Expansion: Qualification and material review is a very important stage in the evaluation of teacher titles. At this stage, the teacher's application materials will be reviewed step by step to ensure that the materials are authentic, compliant and meet the review requirements. From the school, the County Education and Sports Bureau, the County Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, the Municipal Education Bureau, the Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau to the Professional Title Evaluation Committee, each level of audit has a certain authority and decision-making power. The purpose of the review is to screen out teachers who meet the accreditation criteria and prepare them for the next stage. During this process, if a teacher's application is not suitable or qualified, they will be asked to revise it and resubmit it for review. Therefore, teachers need to pay attention to the authenticity and completeness of the application materials, and ensure that they meet the review requirements in order to successfully pass the review and move to the next stage.
After passing the qualifications and materials review, the teacher's materials will be submitted to the jury for review. The experts hired by the jury will conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the teachers' application materials according to certain standards and requirements. The jury adopts the principle of minority obeying the majority, and decides the results by secret ballot. Only with more than two-thirds of the total number of experts present at the meeting will the teacher's application be recognized as approved.
Expansion: The jury review is the most critical part of the entire title review process. The experts hired by the jury will carefully evaluate the teachers' application materials, taking into account the teachers' performance in teaching and research. The jury will vote by secret ballot, and the principle of minority obeying the majority will determine the evaluation results of teachers. Only when more than two-thirds of the total number of evaluation experts agrees with the votes, the teacher's declaration will be recognized as approved. Therefore, teachers need to be prepared at the stage of individual application and school recommendation, and fully demonstrate their teaching ability and scientific research level in the application materials, so as to have a greater chance of standing out in the jury.
After the jury is approved, the list of teachers who have passed will be publicized on the ** of the Municipal Education Bureau. During the publicity period, if there are no objections or complaints, the teacher's evaluation results will be confirmed as valid.
Expansion: The announcement of the approved list is a final confirmation of the review results. After the jury is approved, the list of teachers will be publicized on the ** of the Municipal Education Bureau. During the publicity period, anyone has the right to raise objections or complaints about the evaluation results of teachers. If there are no objections or complaints during the publicity period, the teacher's evaluation results will be confirmed as valid and the teacher will move on to the next stage.
After the end of the publicity period, the deputy high professional and technical qualification will be issued on the evaluation platform, and teachers can **. Then, the teacher will receive an appointment notice from the unit and issue the corresponding appointment letter. In this way, the review process of a deputy senior professional title can be considered to be successfully completed.
Expansion: The issuance and appointment of certificates is the final step in the evaluation of teachers' titles. After the announcement of the list, the deputy high professional and technical qualification will be issued on the evaluation platform, and the teacher can obtain the certificate in the first way. At the same time, teachers will also receive the appointment notice from the unit and officially receive the corresponding appointment letter. This marks the success of the teachers in obtaining the associate senior professional title, which is a testament to their outstanding ability and contribution to teaching and scientific research. It is also a concentrated reflection of the results of the hard work and learning of teachers over the years.
Teacher title evaluation is a complex and rigorous process, which requires teachers to make continuous efforts and preparations in the process of individual declaration, school recommendation, qualification and material review, jury review, publicity of the approved list, and certificate issuance and appointment. Each stage has its own specific requirements and standards, and only by passing the audit at each stage can teachers finally obtain the recognition and honor of professional titles. Therefore, in the process of teacher title review, teachers need to go all out to show their teaching strength and academic level in order to successfully pass the review and obtain the affirmation and recognition of their professional titles. I wish all the teachers who have applied for the deputy senior professional title good luck, successfully pass the review, and achieve their career development goals!