1. The outrage caused by the evaluation data:Understand Che DiThe results of the release of the evaluation data showed that the pure electric range achievement rate of 20 hybrid models was tested in severe cold conditionsBYDLook up to the number one,HuaweiwithThalysJointly builtQuestion M7The extended-range version ranks first from the bottom. This result has aroused doubts and sieges from many car companies.
Expansion: The release of this review data has brought a storm. Many car companies have questioned the results, and at the same timeUnderstand Che Di's test level. First of all, the test results showBYDLooking up to the best pure electric endurance in a cold environment, this givesBYDThe image adds a lot of brilliance. WhileHuaweiwithThalysJointly builtQuestion M7The extended-range version did not perform well in the test, ranking last for the first place. This result has attracted great attention from car companies, and they have questioned the evaluation results.
2. Doubts and counterattacks of car companies: Yu Chengdong questionedUnderstand Che Diof the level of testing, followed by domesticAto carsGreat Wall MotorsandGeely AutomobileDoubts were also expressed. EvenTeslaIt also issued a counterproduct, arguing that testing that deviates from industry standards would mislead the public. The questioning and counterattack of these car companies makesUnderstand Che DiThe test results are highly questionable.
Expanding: In the faceUnderstand Che DiAt the time of the test results, the senior personnel of many car companies stood up and questioned and counterattacked the test. First of allHuaweiVice Chairman Yu Chengdong, he questionedUnderstand Che DiThe test standards and standards are considered to be inaccurate. Subsequently, domesticCarsGiantsAto carsGreat Wall MotorsandGeely AutomobileThey also expressed doubts. EvenTeslaA counter-article was also published, pointing out that testing that deviates from industry standards can mislead the public. The questioning and counterattack of these car companies makesUnderstand Che DiThe test results are highly questionable.
3. The interests of car companies are damaged: this timeUnderstand Che DiThe test results directly hurt the interests of more car companies. Third-party test results will directly affect consumer purchasing behavior, while:Understand Che DiAs a company that has a large number ofFansThe test results published by it have a certain authority in the minds of consumers. Therefore, car companies have expressed great dissatisfaction and siege on this.
Expanding:Understand Che DiThe released test results directly attack the interests of more car companies. Third-party test results, especially like:Understand Che DiThis has a lot of themFansThe platform has a certain authority in the minds of consumers. The release of the test results has caused great dissatisfaction and siege among car companies. Because test results don't just affect a consumer's purchaseDecision-making, which will also have a significant impact on the image and sales of car companies. In the case of threats to their interests, car companies will naturally spare no effort to fight back and question this in order to protect their own interests.
4. The fairness of the test results: about this timeUnderstand Che DiOpinions differ as to whether the test results contain moisture. Personally, I thinkUnderstand Che DiThe fact that it is still in the spotlight after the second test shows that the level of acceptance of its test results is not high among skeptics. As for the presence or absence of moisture, further ** is needed. However, regardless of whether the test results are accurate or not, the siege of car companies has also exposed a problem, that is, the dominance of third-party test platforms does not conform to the principle of fair competition.
Expanding: In this controversy, everyone is rightUnderstand Che DiThere are different opinions on whether the test results have moisture. Personally, I thinkUnderstand Che DiThe fact that it is still in the spotlight after the second test shows that the level of recognition of its test results is not high among skeptics. However, regardless of whether the test results are accurate or not, the siege of car companies has also exposed a problem, that is, the dominance of third-party test platforms does not conform to the principle of fair competition. If there is only one authoritative third-party evaluation body, even if the current test results are not moisture, there is no guarantee that there will be no problems in the future. Therefore, the state should strengthen the supervision of third-party testing and establish a competitive landscape of multiple evaluation institutions to ensure the fairness of test results.
This timeUnderstand Che DiThe release of the evaluation data has aroused questions and sieges from many car companies. Car companies thinkUnderstand Che DiThe test results are inaccurate and misleading to consumers. However, in the debate about whether the test results are fair or not, I personally believe that there are two perspectives that should be considered.
First of all, as a third-party evaluation platform,Understand Che DiThe impartiality and accuracy of the test should be ensured to ensure that consumers receive truthful information. If the accuracy of the test results is guaranteed, then regardless of whether the car company is satisfied or notUnderstand Che Dishould be recognized.
Secondly, behind the doubts and sieges of car companies, we should also see a problem, that is, the dominance of third-party test platforms does not conform to the principle of fair competition. There is only one authoritative evaluation body, and whether the test results are accurate or not, it is difficult to avoid problems. Therefore, the state should strengthen the supervision of third-party testing and establish a competitive landscape of multiple evaluation institutions to ensure the fairness of test results.
Finally, whether the car companies are reluctant to admit it or the test results of the platform are wet, this incident has brought us a thought: in the field of evaluation, how to ensure the fairness and accuracy of the test, and how to establish a competitive landscape of multiple evaluation agencies. These are questions worth pondering.