On December 14, many places in Zhejiang reported the results of the "Clean Network 2023" special operation and announced a case of online trolls. The case involved a "brusher" in the Internet short ** industry named Zheng Moule, who used a cloud control software called "number maintenance assistant" to provide false popularity services by automatically browsing the short ** live broadcast platform in order to obtain high profits. In order to better carry out this activity, he set up studios in his own and his parents' homes, and each studio placed a "mobile phone wall" composed of more than 100 mobile phones to receive swiping tasks. Each phone can make a profit of 018 to 025 yuan.
* This criminal gang was discovered at work, and 19 criminal suspects including Zheng Moule were arrested, 12 criminal dens were destroyed, and more than 2,000 electronic devices were seized. After investigation, it was found that the case involved 1There are more than 30,000 platform anchors, and the amount involved is as high as 10 million yuan.
This kind of cyber water army criminal gang creates false popularity through cloud control software, thus creating the illusion of hot lists, explosive models and order grabbing. This not only endangers the network ecology and disrupts the normal economic order of the network economy, but also harms the rights and interests of ordinary consumers.
This incident has attracted widespread online attention and discussion. Some netizens were shocked by the dense placement of so many mobile phones, and many expressed indignation at the existence and behavior of the Internet water army. People are beginning to think about the impact of cyber trolls on the entire network environment and the market economy.
Cases similar to this one are not uncommon. Similar cyber troll criminal gangs have been operating online for some time now and have had a negative impact on society and the economy. Therefore, the incident will help to further expose and crack down on the activities of cyber trolls and maintain the healthy development of the cyber ecosystem.
For the impact of the whole incident, it can be objectively the following. First of all, this incident has enabled the public to have a deeper understanding and understanding of the phenomenon of cyber trolls, increased vigilance, and strengthened the crackdown on such crimes. Second, this incident exposed the imperfection of the regulatory system for online livestreaming platforms, triggered calls for regulatory norms, and prompted relevant departments and platforms to strengthen their supervision and management. In addition, this incident may have a certain degree of impact on the cyber troll industry chain, making it vulnerable and restricted for a period of time.
Finally, in order to deepen the reader's understanding of the event and make it more interactive, I would like to ask some questions for the reader to participate in. First of all, what impact do you think the cyber trolls have on the network ecology and the market economy?Secondly, how do you think the platform side should strengthen the supervision and governance of the cyber trolls?Also, have you ever come across a similar fake popularity service on the web?If yes, how did you cope?
In general, the ** of this cyber troll case is of great significance to the whole society. It has drawn public attention to the phenomenon and impact of cyber trolls, prompting relevant parties to take measures to combat such criminal acts. It is hoped that in the future, the supervision of cyber trolls can be further strengthened to maintain the healthy development of the cyber environment.