Recently, I saw a story about the installation of elevators in old communities, when the high-rise owners went through the relevant procedures and arranged for the elevator construction unit to enter the site, the low-rise owner Wu obstructed the elevator construction in every possible way, and even destroyed the relevant construction. After a number of units and relevant departments intervened and coordinated to no avail, the high-rise owners directly sued the low-rise owners who obstructed the construction to the court.
In the end, the court ruled that Wu and others were not allowed to obstruct, obstruct or destroy the construction of the additional outdoor elevator. However, even if the judgment takes effect, Wu will still go to the construction site to obstruct and destroy, and finally the court was forced to make the province's first pre-enforcement "injunction".
The so-called pre-enforcement "prohibition order" allows the case to not enter the enforcement stage, and there is no need to impose compulsory measures or pay enforcement fees to the person subject to enforcement, which is conducive to reconciliation between the two parties, but will also directly give the person subject to enforcement an intuitive warning.
The main reason why the court made the pre-enforcement "prohibition order" is that it does not want the neighborhood relationship to be completely deadlocked, so this compromise solution can serve as a warning and function on the one hand, and at the same time allow the neighbors to have room for relaxation. In the end, after negotiation, the high-rise owners compensated the low-rise owners with 20,000 yuan per household, and the low-rise owners agreed not to obstruct the construction of the elevator.
In recent years, with the gradual withdrawal of the monetization of shantytown reform, the old reform has become the mainstream way of urban renewal. More and more old houses are starting to attract attention, especially those that occupy the heart of the city. Even if the house is older, the appreciation of the surrounding schools, businesses, hospitals and other supporting facilities makes the life of the owners more convenient.
According to the latest official data, in 2023, the country plans to start the renovation of old urban communities 530,000, involving 8.65 million households. According to the statistical data reported by various places, from January to October, 5280,000, benefiting 8.7 million residents, and the operating rate is 99 according to the number of communities6%。
In terms of provinces, 24 provinces, including Zhejiang, Shanghai, Hubei, Jiangsu, Guizhou, Fujian, Henan, Anhui, Shandong, Ningxia, XPCC, Guangdong, Inner Mongolia, Hunan, Chongqing, Hebei, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Jiangxi, Hainan, Yunnan, Shaanxi, Qinghai and Xinjiang, have all started construction.
In just 10 months, the nationwide old city renovation plan for 2023 is almost complete, fully highlighting the importance that the state attaches to this project.
Old city renovation, as the name suggests, is to renovate on the basis of old houses, including repairing facades, water and electricity lines, adding parking spaces and play areas, etc. This makes the life of residents more comfortable, especially the installation of elevators, so that the elderly residents can go up and down the stairs more safely and conveniently.
However, installing elevators also faces some obstacles, such as high costs and disagreements between neighbors. In order to solve the contradiction between the residents of the lower and higher floors, some areas have proposed new schemes for sharing elevators. It can be regarded as a complete solution to the disputes between the owners of the lower and higher floors caused by compensation and other issues.
This program has already been implemented in cities such as Kunming, Beijing, Nanjing and Shijiazhuang, and has been officially put into use in some communities.
The operation of shared elevators is similar to that of shared bicycles and shared power banks, and the elevator company is responsible for pre-installation and post-maintenance. All owners do not need to contribute, but owners need to pay per time for taking the elevator, and they can also choose a monthly or annual subscription. This scheme provides a new way to solve the contradiction between high and low floors.
Despite the relatively high cost of shared elevators, all floors of the community currently installed are satisfied. In addition, for owners who want to save money, you can reduce the number of uses or give priority to the elderly to ensure safety first.
However, it is still unclear how long this scheme can last, because there are still many issues that need time to test, such as whether the advertising revenue of the elevator and the elevator card fee handled by the owner can cover the cost of elevator operation. If it can't be covered, then the elevator company can still persist in the repair and maintenance of the elevator in the later stage?
Therefore, it remains to be seen whether this new plan will be more widely accepted.