The shocking secrets of the aftermath of the World War The revenge plan of a Class A war criminal

Mondo Military Updated on 2024-01-28

After the end of World War II, the International Military Tribunal conducted a two-year trial of Japan's leading war criminals. In the end, seven Class-A war criminals including Hideki Tojo were sentenced to death by hanging. However, the trial sparked fierce controversy in Japan and even led to a horrific act of stealing ashes.

A month ago, the army general's lawyer, Mr. Sanmon, had been plotting a follow-up. It was hoped that the ashes of the war criminals would be returned to the bereaved families through an application, but the request was denied. So, they decided to take extreme measures and hatched a plan to steal ashes.

When the lawyers learned that the seven war criminals were to be cremated at the Kubotama Crematorium, they began investigating the nearby temple. The presiding officer of one of the monasteries provided spiritual education to the navy and attended many trials. So, Sanwen Zhengping found the host and asked for help.

They carefully calculated the time of the execution, and invited the temple presiding officer and the head of the crematorium to discuss together. Ambushed near the crematorium before and after the execution, they planned to act at the right time. At seven o'clock the next morning, a car transporting the bodies showed up at the crematorium, while the U.S. military stood guard all around. The director took the opportunity to steal the ashes of the war criminals and put them in the corner of the crematorium. However, the move was soon discovered, and the ashes were quickly recovered and placed in an "offering mound" in the crematorium's backyard.

Faced with their first failure, they decided to find a different path. Taking advantage of Christmas, the U.S. military was relatively loosely guarded, and they once again stole the ashes from the "offering mound", labeled other people's names, and smuggled them to the Atami area for preservation.

In 1958, Aichi Prefecture, the hometown of Class A war criminal Ishine Matsui, decided to build a tombstone for them. In mid-July of the following year, a four-meter-high tombstone was erected on the top of Sanne Mountain in Hatobe-cho. Sadao Araki was released from prison on bail after being sentenced to life, and personally inscribed the tombstone with the words "Tomb of the Seven Martyrs". After the tombstone was built, there was a local craze, and these seven Class A war criminals went from being condemned criminals to "martyrdom" heroes. At the same time, Sugamo Prison, where important Japanese war criminals were held, has also become a symbol of the preservation of "historical sites".

Inside the prison decided to build a grave, and although there was a strong reaction from the outside world, they chose to keep a low profile and carry out internal memorial activities. Although such actions have caused controversy in Japan, they have not stopped to this day.

It's a shocking conspiracy: the revenge plan of a Class A war criminal**!

This article profoundly reveals the unusual revenge plan of Japan's post-war Class A war criminals, and shows the extreme disgust and dissatisfaction of some people in the social background of the time with the outcome of the trial. The article provides a shocking perspective on the aftermath of the trials that ended in World War II and the unscrupulous actions taken by some to fight for control of the ashes of war criminals.

First, the article highlights the social rift that comes with the trial. After the trial, there were strong divisions in Japan, and some people were dissatisfied with the outcome of the trial and made extreme efforts to achieve this. This reflected the social upheaval at the time, and the outcome of the trial did not resonate unanimously throughout society, but instead triggered a strong **, and even evolved into an act of revenge involving ashes.

Secondly, the article reveals the elaborate planning of the revenge plan. Lawyer Sanwen Zhengping began plotting a follow-up a month before the trial, not only knowing the timing of the executions of war criminals, but also successfully planning a series of thefts by finding partners, such as the head of the crematorium and the head of the monastery. These actions demonstrated both their organizational skills and their extreme revulsion at the outcome of the trial, to the point of risking illegal acts.

The description of the construction of the tombstone in the article also provoked me to think about historical memory. The establishment of the tombstone is not only a commemoration of Class A war criminals, but also an attempt to rewrite history. By portraying these war criminals as "martyrs", they try to create a narrative in society that is contrary to the outcome of the trial, making these former criminals heroes in the eyes of the people.

Finally, the preservation of the "historic site" of Sugamo Prison mentioned in the article also got me thinking. Does this act amount to the glorification of historical crimes?Will the preservation of prisons as "historic sites" subtly dilute people's perception of past crimes?

Overall, this essay not only shows the true face of a piece of history through the narration of events, but also makes people think deeply about the turmoil and complexity of post-war society. For these behaviors, we should look at history with a calm attitude and truly understand the past, so as not to repeat the mistakes of the past.

Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!

Related Pages