Yu Minhong faced Sun Dong s choice of twoInterpret Yu Minhong s statement and reveal the rules of th

Mondo Education Updated on 2024-01-30

On the Oriental Selection Plaza, the small essay incident has become a hot topic recently. In this incident, the controversy between Sun Dongxu, the CEO of Dongfang Selection, and Dong Yuhui, the anchor, caused an uproar. With the continuous heating up, there are even rumors that Yu Minhong is facing Sun Dong's choice. This article will interpret Yu Minhong's statement, reveal the workplace rules, personal expression and the boundaries of company management, and make your own thoughts and summaries of the incident.

The essence of this small essay incident is to take credit in the Oriental Selection Square, trying to highlight the importance of his position in the company. However, this act revealed a youthful and unprofessional side, exposing some loopholes in the company's management that allowed competitors to seize the lever, further amplifying the controversy. In this case, CEO Sun Dongxu's response may not have achieved the desired effect. He mentioned Dong Yuhui's salary, which was interpreted as a disparagement of Dong Yuhui. Maybe Sun Dongxu's fans didn't understand what he meant correctly, or the competitors deliberately confused the public, making Dong Yuhui act like he had been wronged, which in turn caused a larger-scale ** turmoil.

In addition, some people even broke the news that Yu Minhong was facing the dilemma of choosing one of Sun Dong's two choices. However, this statement is inconsistent with the principles of workplace rules. In the workplace, employees are in their own place, and leaders are responsible for correcting and pointing out mistakes, so that everyone can work towards a common goal. Yu Minhong's speech revealed the importance of workplace rules and broke the argument that Sun Dongxu and Dong Yuhui had one or the other. Overall, the incident exposed the youthful and immature side, and at the same time reflected the flaws in the company's management.

In response to the small essay incident, CEO Sun Dongxu may not have achieved the desired effect by using Dong Yuhui's salary issue. The move led to a misunderstanding that he had an inappropriate attitude toward Dong Yuhui's salary. As management, Sun Dongxu responded by mentioning that Dong Yuhui's salary was not appropriate and that he was overly responsible. He mentioned apologizing to Dong Yuhui and tactfully pointed out Mr. Sun's drive and lack of mellow at work (such as throwing his phone during a live broadcast). Still, Sun's response has some reasonableness. His responses to Dong Yuhui and Ho were all correct, but his expression may not have had the effect he expected.

In the latest Yu Minhong's **, he expressed his understanding of this small essay incident. He pointed to the reason for the emergence of the tsunami public opinion, that is, the use of official accounts to express personal feelings, which was characterized as a lack of professionalism and a loophole in the company's management. He also mentioned that Sun Dongxu mentioned that Dong Yuhui's salary was inappropriate in response, and that he had engaged in a certain degree of self-criticism from his own perspective as a company leader. He mentioned apologizing to Dong Yuhui, and at the same time called on everyone to pay attention to and love Dongfang Selection and anchors with a rational attitude. He believes that Dongfang Selection and the team are still relatively young, and there may be inconsiderate things in words and deeds, so he asks everyone to forgive him.

Through Yu Minhong's **, we can see the grand pattern of a company leader and his mellow attitude of being proficient in human feelings. His response embodied a workplace rule that employees and leaders should do their part, work together, point out problems, correct mistakes, and succeed together. His speech also revealed the boundaries of personal expression and company management, and called on everyone to remain rational and pay attention to the development of Dongfang Selection and the team, and understand their shortcomings in the process of growth.

In this small essay incident, the merit-grabbing behavior caused controversy, the flaws in the company's management were revealed, and the promotion of competitors and ** made the incident further escalate. CEO Sun Dongxu's response did not have the desired effect, causing misunderstandings. However, Yu Minhong's response shows a workplace rule, as well as the grand pattern and harmonious attitude of a company leader. His speech made us realize the boundaries of personal expression and company management, and at the same time called on everyone to remain rational and pay attention to the development of Dongfang Selection and team. To sum up, I don't think Yu Minhong is facing the dilemma of choosing one or the other between Sun Dong, but this incident shows us his workplace wisdom as a leader and his concern for the future of the company.

Related Pages