$14 billion, U.S. operators issued new regulations, foreign media Huawei said goodbye
At the beginning of Huawei's 5G construction, China said that it hoped that 5G would connect the world.
But as soon as the U.S. sanctions came, cracks appeared in China's beautiful plan and it fell apart.
As the world's leading scientific and technological hegemon, the United States does not believe that China's science and technology can benefit all mankind. In their eyes, China should cede technology products"Cakes", so they played all kinds of tricks under the banner of safety.
The Biden team's management philosophy for Huawei is basically that the Weibo judge sentenced the prisoner to commit suicide by jumping off a building. In short, people are the root of all problems, and if people mess up, the problem certainly does not exist.
As a result, a large number of Huawei and Huawei products were dismantled, the domestic use of Huawei products was also criticized, and foreign Huawei executives were also imprisoned by Lang Danan.
But Huawei's stuff is ruined, what about the communication structure of the West?
At that time, U.S. carriers launched new communication solutions to say goodbye to Huawei.
In order to replace Huawei, the American giant has launched a new scheme.
In order to better replace Huawei, the Western giant has launched a product and solution called Openran.
Different from traditional communication hardware, OpenRAN's model is to break the traditional open interface and provide components from different vendors, as long as the same protocol is met, it can be assembled and run.
A few days ago, Ericsson and Nokia promised to implement this plan to transform 70% of mobile network traffic.
Once successful, Ericsson will replace Huawei with the support of all parties and become the world's leading 5G** provider.
The plan sounds beautiful, but the execution is like a flood of twists and turns.
A new plan for the United States?It's all!
As we all know, the plan is good, but the network quality after rejecting Huawei technology is not a small challenge.
Secondly, the new plan of the United States directly opened the door to a historic turning point, which will greatly increase the ** of 5G, and cost ordinary foreign users tens of thousands of dollars a year.
Finally, the essence of OpenRAN is still far superior to Huawei's stand-alone technology, so it requires group cooperation and group operations to suppress Chinese companies.
It sounds beautiful, but the reality is shocking.
For example, one day there was a problem with OpenRAN in a certain country and the relevant company was asked to investigate.
Nokia came to investigate, but it turned out that it wasn't their problem, so they left;
Ericsson came to investigate once, found out that it wasn't their problem, and left;
The American ** Telegraph Company (AT&T) came to check it out. It may be their problem, but they can't take responsibility and say it's not their problem;
Vodafone has been here and has also said that it may be a problem with their own equipment, but the fault seems to be caused by the neighbor's Nokia device?So in the end it's not their problem, it's Nokia's problem.
See what I mean?Once this package is implemented, it will be nothing more than a tug-of-war where all users will suffer – who cares if 5G succeeds or notThey only care about how to take out Huawei!
Rethink. The United States is working on"***"to put pressure on Chinese telecommunications companies operating in the United States. They are trying to convince other countries that 5G is a good idea. The U.S. has tried to convince other countries to avoid using Huawei equipment when building 5G networks.
In addition, the U.S. side also framed Huawei for having a close relationship with China, claiming that Huawei was conducting espionage activities in the United States. This kind"The thief shouted to catch the thief"seems to have become a consistent practice in the United States.
But the gap in hard power is difficult to erase, and it is too early to say goodbye to Huawei.