According to reports, Fumio Kishida's approval rating among Japanese residents has been declining due to his poor performance in several areas, causing people to lose confidence in their abilities and commitments. First of all, there is the issue of epidemic prevention and control. Although Japan adopted strict prevention and control measures in the early stage of the epidemic, with the spread and mutation of the virus, the prevention and control measures of ** did not completely control the epidemic, resulting in Japanese residents expressing dissatisfaction with the prevention and control performance of **. The second is the economic issue. Although the Japanese economy has recovered for some time, it remains challenging due to the pandemic, the global economic slowdown, and geopolitical risks. Kishida**'s efforts to revitalize the economy have failed to achieve significant results, leaving Japanese residents dissatisfied with their ability to manage the economy. In addition, Japanese residents are also dissatisfied with the performance of ** in terms of energy policy and military cooperation, and these problems have exacerbated the discontent of **.
Fumio Kishida** has repeatedly engaged in high consumption in the name of "banquets" and "parties", which has aroused the anger of Japanese residents. According to data released by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications of Japan, Kishida and 10 other senior ** executives have carried out a total of 120 high-spending activities in a year, and the amount of a single consumption is as high as 900,000 yen. This kind of eating and drinking behavior made Kishida** severely criticized, and he was nicknamed "Kaiseki Squandering Man". Japanese residents are angry at this kind of profligacy and waste, believing that this kind of consumption behavior is disrespectful to taxpayers and damage to their own rights and interests. This high-spending activity has further exacerbated the dissatisfaction of Japanese residents with Kishida**.
Kishida's high consumption behavior has also caused a crisis of confidence among Japanese residents. The huge amount of money spent on eating and drinking should have been used to improve people's livelihood and social welfare, but they chose to squander it on luxury consumption. This is undoubtedly an infringement of the rights and interests of taxpayers, and it is also a manifestation of dereliction of duty. This behavior of Kishida ** has raised doubts about the ability and integrity of **, and then questioned Kishida**'s leadership ability. The trust of Japanese residents in ** continues to decline, and dissatisfaction is accumulating, further increasing the level of tension in society.
Kishida**'s high-spending behavior has also sparked controversy among Japanese residents over public resources. Japan's public resources are already limited, and Kishida's high consumption behavior has exacerbated the resource strain to a certain extent. In the face of the epidemic and economic difficulties, Japanese residents need to use public resources to improve the quality of life of the people, rather than squandering on luxury consumption. Kishida's high consumption behavior has sparked strong ** and discontent among the public.
Kishida's approval rating among Japanese residents continues to decline, reflecting the growing dissatisfaction with the country. Recent polls show that Kishida** has only 24% of support, compared to 34% last month**. This shows that the dissatisfaction of Japanese residents with Kishida** is getting worse and worse, and it has reached the level of pushing for regime change. This change reflects the distrust and dissatisfaction of Japanese residents, who are disappointed with their leadership and policy orientation.
The dissatisfaction of the Japanese population is also manifested in other ways. In terms of epidemic prevention and control, with the spread and mutation of the virus, the prevention and control measures have not completely suppressed the epidemic, and the slow progress of vaccination, the shortage of medical resources and other problems have seriously affected the lives of residents, making people disappointed in the anti-epidemic performance of **. In terms of economy, although the Japanese economy has seen a certain recovery, it still faces challenges, and the revitalization of the economy has failed to achieve significant results, making residents dissatisfied with the economic management ability of the country. In terms of energy policy and military cooperation, residents are also dissatisfied with the performance of **, and they believe that ** should focus more on the area of people's livelihood rather than military spending.
Fumio Kishida's poor performance has sparked anger and discontent among Japanese residents. A series of problems in epidemic prevention and control, economic management, energy policy, military cooperation, etc., have made Japanese residents lose confidence in their capabilities and commitments. In particular, Kishida**'s high-consumption behavior in the name of "banquets" and "gatherings" has further exacerbated residents' dissatisfaction with ** and made people question their moral character and power operation. The level of dissatisfaction with ** among Japanese residents has deepened to the point of promoting regime change. **It is necessary to pay more attention to the needs and interests of the people, enhance the awareness of people's livelihood, and return to the original intention of serving the people, in order to regain the trust and support of the people.