After Brazil took the lead against Argentina, Argentina's attitude began to change. Javier Milley, Argentina's ** Javier Milley, who originally said during the election campaign that he would sever relations with China, Brazil and Russia, has now changed his tune and said that he will never sever diplomatic relations with these three countries. The change casts doubt on whether what he said he said during the campaign would be fulfilled. After all, Milley made some hotly debated rhetoric during his election campaign, saying that he would cut off cooperation with China, Russia and Brazil and switch to cooperation with the United States and Israel. However, after Milley came to power, Brazil responded quickly and decided to put its relations with Argentina on hold until a plan for bilateral cooperation was clarified. The move was both a riposte to Milley's campaign rhetoric and a warning to Argentina. Brazil and Argentina have always had close relations, and Brazil is one of Argentina's largest partners. Lula has repeatedly spoken out for Argentina in international organizations, so Milley's threat to sever ties with Brazil is undoubtedly unacceptable to Lula. But interestingly, during his time in Argentina**, Lula supported Milley's opponent Massa. Milley's failure to be elected is also a "regret" for Lula. In addition, Lula also said he had no interest in attending Milley's inauguration unless he could make a conciliatory gesture. This suggests that more of Lula's grievances come from Milley himself. At the same time, Argentina's rhetoric has changed. Argentina's foreign minister candidate, Diana Mondino, said Argentina would not sever diplomatic ties with China, Brazil and Russia, and would recall its ambassadors abroad except in exceptional circumstances. When asked whether he would "make peace" with China and Russia, Milley asked when he had quarreled with these two countries. In addition, the Chinese leader recently sent a congratulatory message to Milley, who also expressed his gratitude to the Chinese leader on social platforms. Judging from the signals released by Argentina, they will not easily offend China, Russia and Pakistan, and Milley's previous aggressive remarks are clearly aimed at winning votes. Therefore, China's judgment is correct.
When questioned about the direction of China-Arab relations, China insisted on responding with facts. Mao Ning, a spokesman for China, said that there is a misunderstanding of Milley's foreign policy, because no country can develop cooperation without diplomatic relations, especially China as one of Argentina's most important partners. Mao Ning also stressed that China-Arab relations are currently showing a good momentum of development, and the two countries will continue to work in the same direction to promote the further development of bilateral relations. This statement directly broke the rumors of the outside world, and also showed that China still attaches importance to its relationship with Argentina. Argentina is currently facing serious economic problems, with the highest inflation rate in the world, with inflation reaching 116% this year. Argentina is highly dependent on China and Brazil economically, and a rash change in foreign policy would cause Argentina unbearable losses. Although Milley is philosophically quite different from the traditional Argentine style, as the country's supreme leader, he will act in Argentine interests. Therefore, China did not pay much attention to Milley's rhetoric during the election campaign and the voices of the outside world. However, given the current unfavorable situation, Argentina's new ** may take some radical measures in order to solve the economic problems. Therefore, we also need to observe the development of Sino-Arab relations in the future, which will depend on the specific actions and attitudes of Milley. All in all, being cautious in your words and actions is the best option to avoid causing more problems for Argentina.
Argentina's relations with Brazil and China have undergone many twists and turns, which fully demonstrate the complexity and volatility of foreign policy. On the campaign trail, Milley made some radical rhetoric that raised questions about whether he would deliver on those promises once he came to power. However, after Brazil took the lead in attacking Argentina, Argentina changed its attitude and stated that it would continue to cooperate with Brazil, China and Russia. This change shows that real decision-making is often based on trade-offs and practical considerations, rather than simply implementing campaign promises. China's judgment on Sino-Argentine relations is also accurate, and it is beneficial for both China and Argentina to continue to attach importance to and develop Sino-Arab relations. In addition, Argentina is currently facing serious economic problems, and changes in foreign relations could lead to greater economic instability, so it is wise to proceed with caution. As for Milley's next actions and attitudes, we need to observe further. In short, foreign policy should be formulated in accordance with the actual situation and interests of the country, taking into account both internal needs and maintaining good relations with external partners, which is an important factor in ensuring long-term stability and development.