Is it reasonable for faculty members to evaluate their professional titles without attending classes or teaching?
A teacher and researcher who has never brought a student for a day, why should he be rated as a senior student?
The teaching profession is almost unique in the country; They are a special group of people, their profession is education, teaching, but they are very far from their real life, they are already freed from school, the classroom at a very young age. Their job is to write exam papers for schools and sometimes to go to schools for tutoring.
Although according to the regulations of the state, teachers who do not have classes are not qualified to evaluate professional titles, but a teaching and research staff has already been rated as a senior professional title without going to a single class. Therefore, why is the status of researchers higher than that of primary and secondary school teachers in the evaluation of professional titles? The reason seems simple.
First of all, in order to obtain the title of a teacher, it is necessary to have certain qualifications, and a considerable number of these certificates are issued by the school. Faculty members are members of the department, and their qualifications are relatively easy to obtain. In the process of evaluating professional titles, teachers often need to submit excellent course competition certificates and various topic certificates, which are generally issued by the teaching and research department where the teaching and research staff are located. Faculty members are more likely to participate in the competition for outstanding courses and are more likely to win awards. Moreover, it is also up to the department to decide whether the researcher's research project is approved or not, so it is relatively easy for the researcher to get the project certificate. And for all kinds of **, teachers who are researchers can basically send it out easily. This is the reason why researchers have obtained various master's degrees, and most of the famous teachers come from the group of teachers.
Secondly, the teaching and research department is the leading organ of the school and the teacher's work, and has the right to evaluate professional titles, and the right to decide whether to evaluate professional titles lies with the teaching and research department. The examination of the professional and technical qualifications of primary and secondary school teachers in the country is carried out by the teaching and scientific research institutions in various regions, including the evaluation experts. As a member of the department, the faculty members have a better understanding of the review process and the referee, so they are relatively smooth in the evaluation of professional titles.
We surveyed teachers everywhere and found that many of them had fairly high professional titles. In some departments, teachers can easily be assigned to senior positions, but not in schools. This phenomenon cannot but raise people's questions: why is it so much easier for researchers to evaluate their professional titles than for primary and secondary school teachers?
As a professional whose main purpose is teaching and training, the profession of teaching and research is not necessary in the eyes of ordinary teachers. Many teachers believe that the role of researchers is not big enough.
Many teachers who have not been tutored by faculty members can achieve good results in teaching.
Secondly, the teachers are also very good at writing test questions, and sometimes they are above the level of the teaching and research staff. At present, the focus of teachers' work is to produce a set of test papers for the school at the end of each semester, but in practice, front-line teachers can do this job and may have more understanding of the teaching materials and students than the teaching staff. It is only because of the regulations of the education department that teachers on the front line are confined to this position.
If we look at it, many teachers don't know who their teachers are, which can't help but make people question the meaning of their existence.
Finally, I would like to say that the current evaluation system of professional and technical personnel in China is not perfect enough. From a national perspective, among the senior professional and technical personnel, front-line teachers account for very few, mainly leaders, which is very unusual. Wouldn't it be ridiculous to let a group of people without any practical experience be assessed to senior positions so early? Is the job title really suitable for leadership?
If most of the front-line teachers do not get senior titles and their salaries are not raised, this proves that the title system is very unfair and unreasonable.
What do you think about this? Share it!
The author of this article has no intentions, nor does it have any intentions regarding any country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The information provided in this ** does not mean that it agrees or agrees with any laws, rules, opinions, actions, or is responsible for the correctness of the information contained therein. The author of the article is not responsible for the above or related issues, and does not assume any legal responsibility.