It's been a month since the Dynamic Incentive Plan started publishing articles in February, and it's even more stressful, and it's a painful feeling when you sit in front of the computer in a daze and can't figure out what to write. I began to think about why I didn't know what to write, because I had been educated in school for so long, and I could have written many, many words because of the many things that had happened since I could remember. But people really can't rely on their own memory, they used to think that they had a lot of things to say, but they didn't record it at the time, and the past really passed, and they couldn't remember the things they once felt unforgettable. In the past, I heard people say that forgetting is a protective mechanism for people themselves, otherwise many painful and sad things will accumulate in their hearts, and they will often be depressed and sick. Maybe some of the footprints of the past in life have passed away with the wind, and you can't remember it when you look back seriously, only when something happens in the future, you will suddenly have a sense of déjà vu.
Another way to write an article is to write a tutorial and really think about what you really know how to do. In addition to having a lot of experience in coping with exams, I haven't done any professional research, so I have nothing to write about. Then you can only write about what is happening now, but if you only record the trivial things every day, it will become a running account, and there is no need for people to see it. Therefore, there is only one result of the daily shift, which is to record the daily thoughts. The first article I wrote was "Beginning to Output", and the idea at that time was to force my own input through daily output, and input was to accept new ideas, new knowledge, and new understanding. If you want to be able to produce articles every day, you have to read books and think about them. In a sense, I became a second-hand seller of books, and I spread the ideas that had a shock on my mind through writing articles.
After a month of hard work, I found out that the reality is that writing articles every day leads to having to read books every day. I used to think that it was very important to express myself, and when something happened, I read some books, watched some movies, and I would have a lot of feelings that I wanted to record. But it's not the crux of the matter, the desire to express is not important, and if you have the desire to express, you will give up expressing it because you are too lazy to write. Reading a book does not result in writing an article, and writing an article requires people to have to read a book. If anyone wants to read, the answer I would like to give is to start writing. Moreover, once this happens, reading becomes purposeful, no longer simply appreciating the text and understanding what the author is talking about. Reading with a purpose is another situation entirely, human pursuit of science is the best in curiosity, and doing things with a purpose can bring the role of curiosity to the extreme. Many people feel that they can't read it halfway through reading, because reading itself is very boring, and reading for a long time is an anti-human thing. Only when curiosity is driven and people's desire to read or satisfy curiosity increases, will reading become a happy thing.
There is also the problem that books are forgotten after reading them for a while. I was very inspired by the ideas in the book at the time, but the next day after reading it, I was covered with the trivial things of life. Before I had time to practice, the time was taken up by work, and I couldn't remember the books I read after a while. It gives the impression that the book has been read in vain, and then it is hurried to start the next book, falling into the cycle of forgetting after reading it, and then reading a new book after forgetting. In this case, no one can continue to persevere, but will feel that reading is a waste of time. Writing an essay can also change this situation, and the famous physicist Feynman proposed a learning method: to test whether you really understand something by explaining it clearly to others in short words. When applied to reading, it is whether you can explain what you have learned in the book to others. After practice, this really made the reading thing impressive. I recently had 6 articles all about thinking about reading A Brief History of Mankind, including the understanding of imagination, entrepreneurship, socialization, and productivity, which changed my perspective on life.
This is more like a summary of my January article, and although I didn't get much attention through a month of hard work, it was a huge change for my personal growth. I understood a lot of questions in the past, I had a basic theoretical logic to look at things, and I began to be curious about the exploration of the world. I began to become hungry for reading, because without reading I couldn't think, and I couldn't write profound articles. Life begins to be fulfilling, and I always think that today's article task has not been completed, which leads to thinking about life, what to write, and what is the understanding of life today. I suddenly began to understand that the ultimate meaning of life is not important, the key is what you have experienced in the process, and the evaluation criteria for life should be placed in the limited life process, with impulsive, excited, and moving mixed life. There is no such thing as empathy in the world, and Buddhists always say that the feeling of "enlightenment" cannot be taught in words. You still need to seriously understand your own life, because you can't say it before and after death.