In the year, Hu Qiaomu and Huang Kecheng had a disagreement over the title of chairman, and Deng Gong suggested that it be reinstated.
**, as the core of the party's first generation of ** leadership collective, is a great leader who leads the Chinese people to change their destiny and the face of the country. Although in the late 70s and early 80s of the last century, due to the catastrophe of the past ten years, there were differences in the evaluation of *** inside and outside the party, but how to evaluate *** is no longer a simple historical positioning issue, but directly related to China's future development direction and fundamental strategic choice.
Therefore, the correct evaluation and treatment of *** is crucial for China's future development.
Back then, in the party, Hu Qiaomu and Huang Kecheng had different views on how to call ***. One side advocates changing "**" to "comrade" in the manuscript, while the other side argues that such emotional overtones are too thin and must be changed back to "**".
Eventually, the decision was made to revert to "This speech was able to be published under this title."
During the turbulent period of the last century, society was plunged into a long period of turmoil. In this turmoil, not only the leaders of the party and the state, but also a large number of leading cadres of the party, government and army, responsible persons of democratic parties, celebrities from all walks of life, and the masses have all suffered.
This has led to the perpetuation of paralysis and dysfunction of institutions, organizations and institutions at all levels. On the economic front, the country's economic development has slowed down, the relationship between the main proportions has been out of balance for a long time, and the economic management system has become more rigid.
At the same time, education, science, culture and other fields have also been seriously damaged, with far-reaching implications.
In October 1976, the Politburo of the Communist Party of China complied with the expectations of the Party and the people and ended the disaster through a series of actions, and the whole country was immersed in a carnival.
However, the ensuing great discussion on emancipating the mind and putting things in order has aroused widespread attention inside and outside the party, as well as at home and abroad. In the process, some people tried to fish in troubled waters, such as the international hostile forces and the domestic bourgeois liberalizers, who did not hesitate to slander and vilify the great men in an attempt to fundamentally shake people's trust in the Communist Party, their belief in Marxism, and their confidence in socialism.
In the face of this situation, we should firmly stand on the overall situation inside and outside the party, at home and abroad, and resolutely safeguard the ideology of the party. He believes that great men have merits and demerits, but their merits far outweigh their faults, and we must adhere to the principle of seeking truth from facts.
Huang Kecheng attaches great importance to the abnormal remarks in the party under the influence of the West and Hong Kong and Taiwan**. During the discussion of the "Resolution on Several Historical Issues of the Party since the Founding of the People's Republic of China" in 1980, a trend of thought that negated the idea of *** and his own emerged, which made him deeply worried.
Since joining the Communist Party of China in 1925, Huang Kecheng has always adhered to the belief of loyalty to the party and caring for the people. After the founding of New China, in accordance with the instructions of the party and the state, he successfully established a regular system for the logistics work of the whole army, organized the whole army to carry out streamlining and reorganization, and strengthened regularization and integration, thus making outstanding contributions.
When the party made a left-leaning mistake, he stood firm and raised his opposition. In 1959, he was subjected to prolonged scrutiny and removed from all posts for his outspoken criticism of the mistakes of the Great Leap Forward and the People's Commune movement.
During the 10 years of turmoil, he was once again imprisoned and physically and mentally devastated. By the time the turmoil had passed and he was formally rehabilitated, he was already old and frail, blind and blind. However, he still insisted on his work and made important contributions to the party's efforts to put things in order.
Despite all the ups and downs, he still has a deep affection for the Communist Party of China, especially the core of the first generation of the leading collective.
Huang Kecheng adheres to the position of "maintaining the ideology of *** and adhering to ***" on the issue of how to evaluate *** and *** ideology. In November 1980, he attended the symposium as the executive secretary of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection.
Prior to this, Huang Kecheng still remembered the scene of hard work for the country and the party, for which he made full preparations for the upcoming discussion, and even found a secretary to help record the content of his speech.
When he spoke at the forum, he took the lead in putting forward the viewpoint that "we must not forget our roots in life" to expound our position.
He solemnly expressed to all the attendees: "* is the leader who leads us out of suffering and towards a happy life. "Regarding the evaluation of ***, this is an important topic, we should not be emotional, but should be evaluated comprehensively and scientifically. ”
His speech was strong and well-argued, and when he ended, the participants could not help but reflect on their previous criticism. However, Huang believes that this is not enough.
In addition to the participants of this symposium, there are many more people in China who need a more correct and comprehensive understanding of *** and *** thought. Therefore, he decided to increase the publicity of this speech.
After deciding on this idea, Huang Kecheng asked his secretary to find Hua Nan, deputy director of the General Political Department, and discussed with him whether he could publish part of the speech in the military newspaper.
After carefully studying the content of the speech, Hua Nan conducted an in-depth study with the director of the General Political Department and the relevant leaders of the newspaper, and both sides agreed that the article was lofty, sincere, and convincing, and finally agreed to publish it.
After receiving the consent of the General Political Department and the newspaper, Huang Kecheng expressed the hope that they would report to Comrade Xiaoping and obtain approval for republication. Subsequently, the article was sent to ***'s desk through the General Political Department.
**After reading it, he also agreed to publish, but he asked that Hu Qiaomu must conduct a final review of the text before it was officially published. Therefore, this article fell into the hands of Hu Qiaomu again.
Hu Qiaomu served as secretary of *** from 1941 to 1969, and later became president of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and president of Xinhua News Agency. After taking over Huang Kecheng's article, he made careful layout and text modifications, including the adjustment of the title.
Originally, Huang Kecheng used the title "**" in the article, but Hu Qiaomu changed all of it to "**comrade".
Huang Kecheng has no problem with Hu Qiaomu's revised version, except for the symmetry of the title. He believes that "the title of ** can better express deep feelings."
"It's not just a title, it's a recognition." After discussion, it was decided to change the "comrade" in the article back to "Huang Kecheng expressed his satisfaction with this."
In the 80s of the 20th century, when many people made wrong judgments, Huang Kecheng still insisted on upholding the best ideology and looking at the problem rationally and comprehensively.
He insisted on using "**" to address *** instead of "comrade" proposed by Hu Qiaomu in the article, which is also a reflection of his attitude towards ***.
**Similar to Huang Kecheng's views, so he also advocates the restoration of the title of ***, and supports calling him "**Note: This content is**from other platforms or**articles, this platform will indicate** and the author, but does not provide any guarantee for the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the content, for reference only."
This *** is for learning and appreciation, and is not used for any commercial gain. In case of infringement, please provide relevant evidence, we will correct** and the author, or delete the article according to the opinion of the copyright owner, without any other responsibility.