Slow down our pace, insert a topic asked by a friend, and invite everyone, especially the old comrades of the supply and marketing cooperatives, to discuss a problem.
A friend said one thing: Recently, an old employee of a grassroots society asked an acquaintance to find the leader of a county association and asked for a risk mortgage in the early nineties of the last century. According to a friend, a county association held a director's office meeting, and the reply was as follows:
1. Isn't the risk collateral risky? The grassroots supply and marketing cooperatives have lost money, what else do you want?
2. Isn't the risk collateral mortgaged to your materials? Where are the collaterals? Do you still need money? It's enough to be funny if you don't talk to you.
3. At that time, did you give me the money? Why should I be responsible for paying my debts?
Please don't accuse me, I don't make sense of literature and reason, and I use so many question marks. It's that I do have doubts. My opinion is as follows:
1. When people ask for accounts, they don't ask for accounts from a certain director or section chief himself, but from the seat under your buttocks. If you ignore the old things and do not pay off the old debts, a unit will not be able to continue. If you are a director, people are looking for you to report problems, and they are looking for this position, not as an individual. People who are not culturally informed, I don't know how to get into their place?
2. Risk collateral is the last century.
In the 80s and 90s, in order to cooperate with the contract management responsibility system, a risk protection mechanism was implemented for the person in charge of the store, which was not a member share, nor a share capital, nor was it an internal or external fundraising. It is a kind of business guarantee fund collected from the person in charge of the store or the employee in order to ensure that the collective operation is not at a loss. To put it more clearly, as long as the person pays the contract management fee in full according to the business contract, or the subsequent rent, the fund will be refunded. Unless there is any contractual agreement, for example, the operation does not expire, it will not be refunded, the operating loss will not be refunded, etc.
3. Risk collateral, no collateral. The goods in people's grassroots stores have already been processed through different forms. Even if it is not processed, it is still on the account, in this case, it can be deducted from the business risk collateral.
4. There are two words in front of the risk collateral, that is, "operation", the person in charge of the grassroots store or the employee is only responsible for the business risk, and is not responsible for the operation of the grassroots society or the county-owned company, and it is impossible to be responsible for the rise and fall of the county association.
5. For no reason, the risk collateral of the person in charge of the grass-roots store or the employee is invalidated, which is a bit of "the thief is punished, and the thief is the prince". The directors of the county association should also consider the overall situation, how to let the supply and marketing cooperatives return, let the supply and marketing cooperatives make money, instead of "defaulting" without knowing history!
If the avenue is not good, the road will be lost, the river will not be smooth, the turbid waves will flow, the mentality is not right, the world will be wrong, ignorance and ignorance, and the strange phenomenon will be on the verge of emergence. Out of public heart, out of conscience, out of love, we should know the ups and downs of the supply and marketing cooperatives, the great plan of development, and the reality of the employees, rather than acting dirty, and the little family is angry! Supply and marketing cooperatives