ExtensionIn modern society, students' concept of career choice is becoming more and more rational. They no longer just pursue the profession they are passionate about, but pay more attention to the employment prospects and stability of the profession. In contrast, the major of package distribution is popular among students and parents. Nowadays, however, the number of majors assigned to the package is decreasing, and military and police academies have become an option for students. Although the police academy itself does not include allocation, for students majoring in public security, they can take the public security joint examination after graduation, and the acceptance rate of the exam is extremely high, almost reaching more than 98%. Therefore, it can be said that students can be successfully employed after graduation. However, the political review process has become the last door for students to unsuccessfully realize their dreams. The difficulty of the political examination is becoming more and more stringent, and it does not only check the student's personal character and grades, but also investigates the student's immediate family members of three generations, and if the relatives are found to have a criminal record, the student will not be able to pass the political examination. This leads to the fact that the students need to bear the fault of their fathers, making them feel unfair and helpless.
The purpose of expanding the political examination is to screen out talents suitable for state posts and ensure the safety of social security and national interests. The third generation of political review is not a special review for individuals, but a standardized review for everyone. The rationality and necessity of this lies in the following: First, the three generations of political review can form a sense of family responsibility, so that children can realize that they are not only individuals, but also carry the historical responsibility of the family and ancestors. This sense of responsibility fosters filial piety and moral character, and at the same time prevents some innocent but misbehaving people from entering state posts. Second, the third generation of political review can avoid people's distrust and suspicion of the results of political review. If the review standards are relaxed in the political review, it will lead to people questioning the governance ability of the country and the country, which in turn will lead to chaos and instability in the social order. Therefore, it is reasonable and necessary for the three generations of political review.
The extension of the third generation of political censorship has long been controversial. Some people believe that as long as the student himself is good and of good character, there is no need to vet the three generations of his or her immediate family. They believe that it is unfair that students should pay for the faults of family members. However, there are others who hold the opposite view, believing that children can enjoy the benefits of their ancestors, and of course have to bear the consequences. This view is in line with the rationality of the three generations of political review. Everyone has a different opinion and understanding of this issue. In my personal opinion, the three generations of political review are necessary to a certain extent. Although an individual's behavior and conduct have nothing to do with the fault of family members, the three generations of political scrutiny are in order to maintain fairness and social order. At the same time, policy formulation should also take into account family factors and special circumstances to avoid irreparable damage to students' futures.
Summarizing the three generations of political review has triggered extensive discussions and reflections. Although there is some controversy about this system, its rationality and necessity are still worthy of affirmation. The three generations of political review not only help to cultivate the sense of family responsibility, but also ensure the justice and fairness of governance. However, policies should be made more humane, taking into account special circumstances and individual differences, and avoiding unfair treatment of outstanding students. I hope that in the future, we can provide more opportunities for students to realize their dreams on the premise of ensuring social order.