The biggest victim of the education ranking evaluation problem is the child!
The biggest problem in education now is ranking and comparison, which makes our children suffer the most!
In recent years, China's education problems have become more and more prominent, and the study pressure of college students has also increased. Although the state has implemented a "double burden", the effect of "burden reduction" is not obvious. Why is it so hard to reduce the burden? At the center of this problem is sequencing and evaluation.
Education is hard to quantify, but as long as there are achievements, everything can be quantified. Many schools have accurate teacher ratings to the decimal point and are closely linked to bonuses, job titles, performance, etc., forming an incentive mechanism. However, such assessments tend to cause more harm to students, and few people really pay attention to their living conditions.
First, the education department will rank the schools, and the schools will rank the teachers. Can teachers really not grade their students? Although the Ministry of Education has regulations that the test results cannot be made public, and students cannot be ranked, the school still uses a variety of means to evaluate students, which is that the principal is pressuring teachers to "compete for the first". In that case, how can a teacher not rank students and put pressure on them?
How can teachers improve their performance without stress? Can schools really know about teachers who are not performing well? Some principals require low-level teachers to conduct self-assessments, and some schools have reduced their performance awards. Teachers face dual pressures from their schools and job titles, and it's hard for them to ignore their academic performance.
So, even if the state mandates that schools cannot grade students, will the financial pressure on students be reduced as a result? On the contrary, the burden looks even heavier. If the assessment method remains unchanged, it will lead to an increasing burden on students.
Second, if teachers want to improve their grade average, they must put pressure on students, which is an important factor in "reducing the burden". Some people feel that it is a good thing for teachers to put pressure on students because it helps them in their learning. However, everyone has their own ambitions, and not everyone can withstand the pressure.
In class, some students have a maximum of 30 points, but the teacher will put pressure on them to do a lot of homework to increase their pass rate. If a student has difficulty in learning, the teacher will beat and scold or even physically punish him. How is it possible not to let your child feel frustrated under such pressure?
Every child is unique, with their own talents and qualities. Why do we have to give them good results? How can today's education, which does not even give every child the opportunity to grow normally, reduce the burden on them?
Thirdly, before evaluation, individualized teaching has become an empty concept, an unrealistic idea for schools and teachers. It seems that there is only one purpose of education - scores. In the face of evaluation, personalized education has become an empty slogan, which no school and every teacher can achieve.
In these days, only grades are the only goal of education. In the face of scores, good character is worthless, as long as the score is poor, it is poor. Every child is born with a bad birth, which causes them to have low self-confidence.
Educational administrators focus their attention on the evaluation and measurement of schools and teachers, thus making assessment a tool for regulating teachers. Assessment is not a distrust of the teacher, it is just a regulatory tool. The teachers are confident and don't want to be left behind. The assessment produces control over the whole teacher.
Third, education is about educating people, not just about grades. Each student has their own unique personality, not a machine. However, the long-term stress of learning leaves children physically and mentally exhausted and exacerbates the problem. What are reviews used for? Is it really needed?
What do you think about this topic? Share it!
The author of this article has no intentions, nor does it have any intentions regarding any country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The information provided in this ** does not mean that it agrees or agrees with any laws, rules, opinions, actions, or is responsible for the correctness of the information contained therein. The author of the article is not responsible for the above or related issues, and does not assume any legal responsibility.