The decent job that parents want is actually unbearable, and the top profession is unexpected!
Considered by parents to be"Good job", in fact, they are destitute, and their first job is amazing!
Many educators have called the title "the cancer of education" and argued that if education is to be saved, it must be abolished. Why? Everybody knows that.
Originally, this title was given to recognize the competence of teachers, as well as the recognition of their professional abilities. However, I don't know when it began, the word became the most powerful tool to squeeze those teachers who were suddenly in a weak position, and they could only suffer in silence and did not dare to complain.
In terms of continuing education, teachers who are unwilling to work are directly deprived of their professional and technical qualifications; Even if the superior gives an unreasonable task, as long as the student does not obey, the school can revoke the evaluation title; Teachers who do not want to be class teachers do not have the conditions for evaluating professional titles; Teachers who are unwilling to go to the countryside to teach are not eligible for professional titles; For teachers who do not wish to participate in various activities, the school reserves the right to revoke their professional titles. Many teachers are complaining that because of the problem of their professional titles, they have to give up their dignity, only obedience, and do not even have the courage to resist. Now, the professional title has become a sharp weapon for school leaders to squeeze teachers, without a professional title, who will oppose a salary increase if they want to raise their salary? In the process, the teachers' self-esteem is slowly lowered, and they can only succumb to reality for their meager salaries. But if a teacher doesn't even have a teacher of his own, then how can he teach a good student? Will students be respectful of such teachers?
Originally, the title was an affirmation of the teacher's educational level, but now, the title is only linked to the teacher's salary. No matter how you get a senior position, as long as you are evaluated, your benefits will increase. What's even more helpless is that even if you are rated with a job title, you can continue to get a high salary after retirement. Therefore, many senior teachers would rather retire from the front line than have much impact on their high income. For those teachers who do not have a job title, although they work hard, their salary cannot be increased. Although the teaching results are the best in the country every year, there will be no good treatment. In a word, the salary of teachers is only linked to the professional title, not the amount of work and performance.
So, in the world of education, titles have become a sign of wealth and power. The higher the professional title, the more it can reflect its high income and social status, but it cannot really reflect the quality of its education and training.
In a people-oriented society like ours, the introduction of a professional and technical job evaluation system is inherently a potential corruption. Job titles are obtained by examination, not by work performance. However, at present, the right to evaluate the professional titles of teachers in colleges and universities in China is mainly exercised by school leaders, and grassroots teachers do not have any right to speak or make decisions on this. Do the teachers know what the honors, certificates, indicators of each unit are? Not at all. From our teaching experience, senior teachers make up the majority. We look at various famous teachers and subject leaders, and they are also dominated by leaders. The teachers who can get the special prize are the elite of the elite. Why can't you be a teacher and not be a teacher?
In fact, there is also a big problem in the evaluation of professional titles, because most of the leaders are judged by the above, which is a very strange thing in itself.
First: let teachers have the honor of teaching, not to worry about the title, and not to come for the title. Second, the development of education cannot only rely on a small number of senior teachers, to make the development of education, only relying on individual senior teachers is not enough, we must respect the efforts of all teachers, give them more opportunities, as long as there are no big mistakes, slowly, will slowly improve. Third, eliminate corruption in education: eliminate corruption in education, purify campus culture, and create a social environment conducive to cultivating students. Fourth, improve the happiness of all teachers: let all teachers have a sense of happiness, so that they can devote themselves to the cause of education, instead of worrying about the evaluation of professional titles. Diligent, diligent, not fighting for fame and fortune, and not groveling, are the most valuable qualities of a teacher. However, how can today's teachers, who are losing their dignity for their titles, put all their energy into teaching?
The author of this article has no intentions, nor does it have any intentions regarding any country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The information provided in this ** does not mean that it agrees or agrees with any laws, rules, opinions, actions, or is responsible for the correctness of the information contained therein. The author of the article is not responsible for the above or related issues, and does not assume any legal responsibility.