Huo Mu.
Fraudulently covering the soil on the hardened ground, and falsely adducing evidence in the form of temporary transplanting of sugarcane and posing for fixed-point shooting, the 209 acres of breeding pits and ponds were investigated as cultivated land ...... in violation of regulationsA few days ago, the Ministry of Natural Resources publicly announced 16 typical cases of cultivated land surveys, involving 7 typical problems of fraud and 9 typical cases of incorrect cultivated land area of more than 1,000 mu due to lack of seriousness and lax control.
The protection of cultivated land is a major issue in the country and has a bearing on national food security. It is necessary to take hard measures to "grow teeth", comprehensively consolidate the responsibility of local party committees at all levels and the best cultivated land protection, strictly assess and pursue responsibility for life, and ensure that 1.8 billion mu of cultivated land deserves its name. From December 2023 to February 2024, the National Natural Resources Supervision Agency carried out special inspections on the 2023 national land change survey, focusing on the authenticity and accuracy of the inflow and outflow of cultivated land. The cultivated land data in the annual land change survey results are the basic basis for the assessment of cultivated land protection and food security responsibility system, so as to ensure accuracy and credibility. In this sense, those behaviors that are fraudulent in the protection of cultivated land and the change of cultivated land types, and the behaviors that cause data errors due to lack of seriousness and strict control of relevant work, not only need to be corrected in a timely manner, but also the illegal acts must be dealt with in accordance with law and discipline. The notification of relevant typical cases this time has played a role in warning and education to a large extent.
Judging from reality, some problems of deception are of a bad nature, and the problems of not being serious in work and not strictly guarding the gates are representative and need to be paid close attention to. For example, individual localities and relevant departments have organized and systematically violated the rules of change, evaded supervision by fraud, and falsely increased cultivated land; Another example is that in some places, there is a situation of discovering problems, making surprise rectifications, simplifying, and "one size fits all". All of this has seriously affected the authenticity of the results of the land change investigation. This also shows from one side that to keep the "red line" of cultivated land, we must be vigilant against all kinds of illegal occupation of cultivated land, prevent fraud and other behaviors, and intensify the crackdown on illegal occupation and destruction of cultivated land with strict supervision and law enforcement and strong supervision.
The purpose of publicly circulating typical cases is to draw inferences.
Third, prevent the slightest. This requires all regions to take action, comprehensively investigate problems, discover and organize rectification in a timely manner, and earnestly focus on key links, implement key tasks, strengthen key measures, and curb the problem of illegal land use in the germination. At the same time, the national natural resources supervision agency should also further strengthen the supervision efforts, continue to carry out inspections, seriously supervise the investigation and punishment of fraud, serious investigation and other problems, better serve the assessment of cultivated land protection, and ensure that the strictest cultivated land protection system is effective.
Further, the problems of fraud, lack of seriousness in work, and lax control are closely related to the lack of awareness of cultivated land protection in some places, the lack of implementation of the new development concept, and the deviation of the implementation of policies. The more prominent the problem is, the more we should persist in treating both the symptoms and the root causes, not only through the supervision and law enforcement and other institutional channels, so that supervision and law enforcement must be strict, but also to build a solid ideological concept of "protecting cultivated land like protecting giant pandas". Fundamentally speaking, only by letting the concept of protection really take root in our minds, making the measures to "grow teeth" effective, and never allowing anyone to be flexible or manipulative in the protection of cultivated land, can we firmly guard the red line of cultivated land and consolidate the foundation of food security.
In the new era and new journey, the task of cultivated land protection has not been reduced, but has become more arduous. This requires that "every inch of land must be contested" and "not an inch of land will be conceded". If we continue to consolidate the responsibility for cultivated land protection, never give in to ensure that the red line of 1.8 billion mu of cultivated land, and are absolutely unambiguous in strict assessment, accountability and supervision, the space for those deceptions will become smaller and smaller, and the level and ability of cultivated land protection will also be raised to a new level.