43fcd98b9aa70e45de6ef7c0a1c68b0c_640_wx_fmt=jpeg&from=appmsg&wxfrom=5&wx_lazy=1&wx_co=1
Straight newsToday (February 20), the Red Cross Society of Quanzhou City sent people to accompany the families of fishermen to Kinmen to deal with the aftermath of the vicious incident that led to 2 deaths and 2 injuries caused by the Taiwan chase, what do you think about this? Recently, the mainland coast guard patrolled and enforced the waters of Xiamen and Kinmen, and boarded the Kinmen yacht for the first time.
Shenzhen Satellite TV's "Live Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan" special commentator Chen BingAfter the mainland fishermen were chased and killed by Taiwan's "Coast Guard vessel," the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council put forward two demands to the Taiwan side, one is to properly handle the aftermath of the victims and their families, and the other is to ensure the personal safety and property safety of the fishermen in the future. However, the Taiwan authorities pretend to be deaf and dumb, and some of the lower-level ** still want to mess around. The mainland has no choice but to respond to the people's calls with concrete actions to ensure order and safety at sea. As a result, the Fujian Coast Guard strengthened its police force and carried out regular law enforcement patrols in the Jinxia waters, the first step of which was to board the "Churi" yacht from Kinmen for a temporary inspection of about 30 minutes. The reason why the mainland coast guard's boarding and inspection has attracted widespread attention is that it contains too much information, which provides a variety of possibilities for the mainland to handle cross-strait affairs in the future, and the scope of handling may be extended from the Jinxia Sea to the Taiwan Strait.
As far as my personal observation is concerned, the mainland coast guard has released at least three signals when boarding a ship for inspection.
First, the mainland has proved with its law enforcement actions that there is no so-called "forbidden and restricted waters" between Kinmen and Xiamen, and that they have been shared by fishermen on both sides of the strait since ancient times. In this way, the so-called "crossing the line" theory of the Taiwan authorities has been penetrated, and Taiwan's "coast guard boat" has pursued the mainland fishermen to death, which has become an illegal atrocity, and the Taiwan authorities are speechless.
The second is that the Fujian Coast Guard will strengthen its police force and carry out regular law enforcement patrols in the Jinxia sea area. This shows that the mainland coast guard has the right to manage the entire Jinxia sea area and has the actual control ability to maintain order in the sea area and protect the lives and property of people on both sides of the strait. Taiwan's "Coast Guard" seems to have become redundant, at least in the Jinxia waters. This tactic seems familiar, and the Taiwan authorities have ignored the mainland's warnings and colluded with the United States to engage in "** activities," and the PLA's patrols around Taiwan have become normalized.
The third is that the mainland coast guard hints at the possibility of future action. Taiwan has sensitively used illustrations in its reports, and found that the six law enforcement vessels dispatched by the Fujian Coast Guard circled around Kinmen Island and were closely following the frontline activities of Taiwan's so-called "forbidden and restricted waters." They specifically marked the waters southeast of Kinmen Island, where Taiwan's "coast guard ships" happened to be on the route between Kinmen Island and Taiwan Island. If this happens, how should the authorities respond? In other words, the mainland coast guard boarding the ship for inspection, has touched on the substantive issues. ** The authorities do not agree with one China and do not recognize the "92 Consensus", so how can they have dialogue and exchanges with the mainland? If there is no communication and dialogue between the two sides of the strait, how can cross-strait peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait be maintained? The rest of the choice is to let the mainland act.
The top leader of Taiwan's defense department said that Taiwan's military will not intervene in the mainland coast guard to board a ship for inspection, and that any intervention will lead to an escalation of the conflict. Taiwan's coast guard department is at a loss for the actions of the Fujian Coast Guard. In short, although it only takes 30 minutes to board the ship for inspection, the mainland has shown all the possibilities encountered in dealing with ***.
Straight newsThe Taiwan authorities suddenly announced before the Spring Festival that Taiwan tourism organizations would not be allowed to organize group tours to the mainland. Why do we have to set up all kinds of cards for the most apolitical things like tourism?
Special Commentator: Chen BingIn the eyes of the Taiwan authorities, all matters involving the mainland have been smeared with strong political overtones. If the Taiwan authorities are pursuing a "line," then they will "oppose China whenever they meet." Tsai Ing-wen is like this, and Lai Qingde even takes "resisting China" as a political banner. It is not difficult to understand why the Taiwan authorities have to set up a card for such a thing as organizing a group tour to the mainland, so that Ma Ying-jeou is puzzled, saying that the authorities are too strange.
The Taiwan authorities have set up cards for group tours to the mainland, explaining three issues:
First, if we take the "first-class line," we will inevitably "pull hatred" toward the mainland and politicize everything related to the mainland.
Second, taking the "** line" will harm the interests of the Taiwan people. The establishment of a card for group tours to the mainland not only deprives tourists of their freedom, but also damages Taiwan's tourism organizations. They don't have a business to do, so what do they rely on to eat? If it is extended further, it will affect Taiwan's employment rate.
Third, they are not qualified to hold consultations and communicate with the mainland, and the two sides of the strait are inseparable from each other in terms of economy, trade, and culture. Without cross-strait exchanges, the island of Taiwan is likely to shrink. Just as the people of Taiwan have said, the Taiwan authorities' "anti-China" will not hurt the mainland, but they may become a killer of "poor Taiwan." ** The Taiwan authorities are using the tourism industry and Taiwan tourists as "hostages" to blackmail the mainland, and as a result, Taiwan's tourism industry has paid a huge price and has had a very small impact on the mainland's tourism market. Taiwanese tourists account for only 1About 5%.
Having said that, the phenomenon of "self-harm" such as tourism card setting is inseparable, and the supporters of ** can't get rid of it. I hope that this incident, as well as the incident that has just occurred in the murder of a mainland fisherman in Kinmen, will make the people of Taiwan more soberly realize that the two sides of the strait are inseparable and inseparable, and that only political parties that adhere to one China and agree with the "consensus of '92" will have the ability to coordinate and bring benefits and benefits to the people on both sides of the strait.
*: Shenzhen Satellite TV direct news WeChat***