annulment, often used in legal contexts, means "annulment of marriage judgment, annulment of marriage". A court judgment declaring his marriage null and void. The annulment of a marriage is a legal process in which a marriage is declared null and void. Annulment of a marriage is not the same as divorce. Strictly speaking, an invalid marriage is a marriage that can be reversed.
annulment：annulment is a legal procedure for decl aring a marri age null and void. annulment differs from divorce where the court ends an otherwise l ega l marriage on a specific date.
annul:to state officially that sth is no longer legally valid abolished; Cancel; Declared null and void.
Related Legal Terms:
annul engagement annul engagement annulment of the marriage contract.
The annulled award was reversed.
expressly annul is expressly repealed.
annul reaffirm declares null and void.
annul explicitly repealed.
Annulled Share deregisters its shares.
Refer to bilingual example sentences:
the amendment added section 5a(a), according to which, the court may allow, under certain circumstances, the realization of the right to division of property, namely the right of each spouse to half of the couple’s total property, prior to the divorce or the marriage annulment in each of the aforementioned forms. daccess-ods.un.org
A new section 5a (a) has been added to the amendment, according to which the court may grant the right to division of property in certain circumstances, whereby either spouse may acquire the right to half of the total property of the husband and wife until the above-mentioned forms of divorce or annulment of marriage.
the directors may establish any local boards or agencies for managing any of the affairs of the company, either in hong kong or elsewhere, and may appoint any persons to be members of such local boards, or any managers or agents for the company, and may fix their remuneration, and may delegate (with or without power to sub-delegate as the directors shall determine) to any local board, manager or agent any of the powers, authorities and discretions vested in the directors, and may authorise the members of any local boards, or any of them, to fill any vacancies therein, and to act notwithstanding vacancies, and any such appointment or delegation may be made upon such terms and subject to such conditions as the directors may think fit, and the directors may remove any person so appointed, and may annul or vary any such delegation, but no person dealing in good faith and without notice of any such annulment or variation shall be affected thereby.
The Board may establish any local committee or body in Hong Kong or elsewhere to administer any affairs of the Company and may appoint any person to be a member of such local committee or to appoint a manager or ** for the Company, and may determine their remuneration and may delegate any power, authority and dealings conferred on the Board to any such local committee, manager or** (with or without the force of delegate at the discretion of the Board), and authorise any member of the local committee or any committee to fill any vacancy therein, and delegated office irrespective of vacancy, and any such appointment or delegation may be made on such condition as the Board thinks fit; The Board may remove any person so appointed and may revoke or vary any such authority, except for persons who intend to carry on business and have not been notified of the withdrawal or change.
such recognition, while not intended to minimize the non-reciprocal application of other treaties, is needed for the special case of human rights treaties, given the emergence of both regional and international human rights treaties, which, despite signifying a momentous achievement in the protection of the individual with regard to state power, are regrettably often attended by declarations by some states that modify or annul a basic right recognized in the treaty, or that render their fulfilment of the treaty contingent on the actions of another state, with the intention of protecting their own interests rather than those of the persons under their jurisdiction. daccess-ods.un.org
Such recognition is not intended to minimize the non-reciprocal application of other treaties, but rather to the specific needs of human rights treaties, since the emergence of regional and international human rights treaties, while indicative of significant achievements by national authorities in the protection of individuals, it is unfortunate that there are often States that declare the modification or abrogation of a fundamental right recognized in a treaty, or view the actions of another State as a condition for the performance of the treaty, with the intention of protecting their own interests rather than those of those who benefit their jurisdictions.