As you can see, we have a lot of people who are currently eating "fiscal meals". Over the past few decades, many experts and scholars have told us that state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are bloated, overstaffed, and inefficient. However, in recent years, there have been fewer and fewer people in state-owned enterprises, and more and more people in government organs and institutions.
According to published figures, there are currently 716 in the countryThere are 70,000 public officials and 970,000 "public officials", that is, more than 8 million public officials in the country. But this is not the end, we still have the party and the masses, trade unions, women's federations and other workers, a total of 12 million, as well as 31 million public institutions, of which 44 million are not state officials, that is to say, our country has to support at least 52 million people. If you count the retired veteran cadres, it will be 81 million!
Moreover, this is still within our plan, and we also have a large number of supernumerary employees, such as temporary workers, ombudsmen, etc. Add in their spending, which is more than 40% higher than taxes! Such a huge financial resource is really amazing!
Their lives are maintained by ordinary people. Today, there are so many people who "rely on ** to eat" that the general public is overwhelmed and unbearable.
If their needs cannot be met, then it is most reasonable to reduce the number of "dependents", in other words, there is still a surplus of human resources in these two sectors, which must be adjusted as soon as possible. However, we have already done this "downsizing" adjustment many times, counting the previous ones, we have already done it eight times! Every time, it was done with great fanfare, gongs and drums, and as a result, round after round, not only did not decrease, but more and more. New departments are constantly being added and the number of employees is increasing. Don't you think there's something strange about this?
Why, then, can't we carry out a radical overhaul and weed out the redundant, redundant institutions that don't need to be dealt with?
In fact, neither managers nor ordinary employees can have the concept of "protagonist". Everyone knows that they are "wage earners", or "temporary", they are just a temporary camp, a temporary camp, a temporary camp, a temporary camp. It is enough to hand over one more "opponent". He felt that if he did one thing, it would be a large number of laid-off workers, increasing the number of unemployed, increasing uncertainty, and leaving him and his relatives with an "adversary" that would be a bomb that could be used at any time, so any wise leader would not do this kind of thing. Besides, everyone is in a circle, what is there to be fired? If you mess up, you'll be expelled! It's always difficult to cut yourself in half.
They always feel that civil servants are the foundation of national stability. Not much?
The more advanced the place, the more talents, the more remote the place, the fewer talents, many county offices, only five or six people, at most ten people. You must know that at present, most of our countries are implementing a quota system, and now a large number of downsizing is undoubtedly a huge test for our grassroots work. Without a large number of public officials, many jobs will be struggling and falling into a situation of passivity and powerlessness.
At the end of the day, it's just "for life". Cutting off other people's livelihood and expecting others to do things for him, he will not do this kind of thing. Moreover, if everyone doesn't rob him of his things, can he still take it seriously? Besides, it's even worse if there are no new hires. Counting on an old man who is about to retire? Don't think about it. Although some agencies can be streamlined and some personnel can be streamlined, in practice it does not have much effect.
You may not know it, but we've been advocating for streamlining the organization, simplifying processes, reducing forest management, reducing agricultural management, reducing the retirement sector, reducing unknown staff, and if a supervisor has a hot head, plus a group of people who live on finances, do you know how difficult it is to streamline work?
To make the team"**"The best way to do this is to cut back on the number of recruits. That is, there was a period of adoption"Only in and out, not in"so that the number of employees naturally declines. In fact, this approach has already been adopted in many regions. As far as I know, when recruiting teachers, many localities adopt the method of "retreating three into one", that is, three people are retired, and only one is allowed to stay, and some areas implement methods such as "retreating from two and advancing into one" and "retreating from five into three". This policy has been implemented for many years, and in fact it is also reducing the number of financial supporters and reducing financial pressure. Teachers are one of the most popular institutions, which is why I would say that the work of teachers is not stable.
A clock is composed of countless parts, without a screw, it cannot work normally, a country, just like a machine, every functional part, is a screw, in order to ensure the normal operation of a country. Management is also a very complex thing, and it is not an easy thing to do.
The more stormy it is, the harder it is to make money! There will be more and more people who want to rely on money to eat, hardship, hardship, hardship, everything, how can it be so easy to go? You don't dare to fight with me, can you? Now, you finally understand why a public institution is a stable job. Rome was not built in a day, it had to be melted little by little. We can't lay off public officials, but we can lay off more. He gave up the job establishment and chose to apply for the exam instead, and this time, everyone understood his intentions.
The ninth round of organizational change is coming, let's wait and see what kind of changes this play will bring to the public! February** Power Stimulation Program