The 2024 title review has kicked off, and it should be noted that the title application materials cannot be changed after the submission of materials, so what factors are related to the title pass rate?
The number of applicants in the current year
Unlike the ordinary entrance examination, where you can pass the certificate if the score is enough, the title review is based on the jury's scoring, multi-dimensional evaluation, and finally the result. Depending on the number of applicants in the current year, the number of applicants who pass each year will remain at an approximate proportion.
This is why there are many and few engineers who get certificates in different cities every year, and the pass rate is based on the proportion of declarations.
In particular, it is difficult for senior titles to pass smoothly, and due to its particularity and importance, the requirements for various conditions are also higher. Senior engineers have become the "sweethearts" in the field.
Material readiness
The number of applicants and the quota limit are beyond human control, and the biggest impact on the pass rate is the preparation of individual materials.
After passing the preliminary examination, the jury selects outstanding talents with strong ability or who can fully reflect professional and technical skills in their work according to the submitted ** and performance materials.
Written Materials Section:
01**Depth of content and whether it is published in core journals.
This is a problem that many talents are easy to ignore, for the first requirements, many talents do not think so, as everyone knows, a good ** is also more important in the eyes of the judges.
02 Volume, size and participation in performance.
*Represents the academic achievements of many years of experience in the industry, while the performance materials are based on years of project management experience and research. Generally speaking, the greater the performance, the more authoritative you are in the field of engineering, and whether you have worked on large-scale engineering projects is also one of the criteria.
Your participation in the project, whether you are in charge or independently, reflects your importance in the project. Therefore, when preparing the materials, we need to provide proof of a project that is as large as possible and has a high level of individual involvement.
The application materials are beautiful (attitude issues).
There are so many small partners who declare their titles every year, and the judges are also relatively big if they just look at the performance, and everyone must remember that when they go to school for the exam, sometimes the teacher will also give the paper score.
In the title review, the aesthetics of your performance materials is also known as the "volume score". Don't ignore this, for binding, and non-standard formats will even be directly excluded!
At the time of filing, the official document did not specify how and how you need to prepare your performance materials, but only gave a general specification, so we came across various versions when we showed you the results.
Some are sandwiched up with folders; Some were bound by staplers; There are also those that are directly glued together, and there are more performance proofs, so how can the judges review such materials for you? Usually such an engineer just passes.
The pass rate given here is only a few points based on the experience of previous years, but on the whole there is not much difference. The specific results still need to be subject to the official publicity, and in the end, I believe that everyone can successfully win the title of engineer!