I've seen an exhibition abroad before, and it's getting a lot of attention.
The theme is, what kind of clothing are you wearing when you are being abused?
I saw this exhibit online, which shows the clothes worn by some of the women who have been wrongfully abused on the day of their misfortune.
It wasn't until I saw the exhibition that I realized that it was proving something.
That is, those who preach the guilt of the victim are indeed a despicable act.
Because of this kind of behavior, it seems to be excusing the criminal.
It is worth reminding here that in fact, not only women are violated every year, but also many men and children.
When I was in a law class in college, my teacher used to say.
It's not that there aren't men who are victims, it's not that they're unwilling to assert their rights.
Because the definition of infringement in the law only stays at the level of "woman".
Therefore, the problem of men is difficult to define.
Therefore, for men, it is more difficult to defend their rights when they encounter this kind of thing.
February**Dynamic Incentive Program Wearing black**, miniskirts, and suspenders, there shouldn't be many men walking around the street, right?
They may not be wearing as explicit as the vests and shorts of the old man at the entrance of the village, but they may be the target of the gay community.
So for these men, their situation will be worse than that of women.
Most of them, after being violated, will choose to remain silent rather than public.
Fortunately, they were too embarrassed to speak out, and they didn't go around crying about their misery.
Otherwise, you are likely to be told things like, "Dressed revealingly,**
Or "You must be posing to seduce someone", "Why doesn't he harm others, but only you?" ”
So I've always believed that a crime is a crime, and don't blame it on how you dress.