In this competitive workplace, interviewers always like to ask strange questions to test the resilience of job seekers.
Today, let's tell a story about such a question: "Tang Seng, Sun Wukong, Zhu Bajie, Sha Seng, who is more suitable to be a programmer?" This may seem like a ridiculous question, but in fact it is a mystery.
Below, let's see how the two candidates used their wits and creativity to answer this unorthodox question.
Xiao Zhang is a fresh graduate who has just graduated from the computer science department of a prestigious university, and his eyes are flashing with love for **.
Faced with this problem, he did not panic, but showed his logical thinking and creativity.
Xiao Zhang said confidently: "In my opinion, Sun Wukong is the most suitable for being a programmer. "First of all, Monkey King has seventy-two variations, which means that he can flexibly deal with all kinds of programming problems, just as we need to constantly change our thinking when faced with bugs.
Secondly, Sun Wukong's fiery eyes can perceive the essence of the problem, which is a very important ability for ** debugging.
Finally, his somersault cloud allows him to quickly shuttle between different projects and tasks, increasing productivity.
Xiao Zhang's answer is not only logical and clear, but also full of imagination. He used the characters in "Journey to the West" to compare the qualities that a programmer should have, and his ideas were novel and refreshing.
Xiao Li, a programmer with three years of work experience, faced the same question, his answer was closer to reality.
I think Sand Seng is the best fit to be a programmer. Xiao Li calmly analyzed that although Sha Seng is not as beautiful as Sun Wukong, he is down-to-earth and steady, which is indispensable for being a programmer.
Coding often requires patience and meticulousness, and the image of the sand monk carrying a heavy burden is a perfect reflection of the programmer's responsibility when faced with heavy tasks.
Moreover, Sha Seng always pays quietly in the team, and this team spirit is equally important in the development process.
Xiao Li's answer seemed more mature and practical, he did not choose the most dazzling role, but chose the sand monk who best suited the professional characteristics of programmers, showing his deep understanding of the workplace.
The interviewer's question may seem like a test of the candidate's resilience and creative thinking, but it is actually a test of their understanding of the professional traits of programmers.
Both Zhang and Li have demonstrated their wisdom and knowledge of their profession in different ways. As Albert Einstein said, "Imagination is more important than knowledge." ”
In the workplace, we not only need solid professional knowledge, but also rich imagination and innovation ability.
Whether it is Xiao Zhang's creative thinking or Xiao Li's practical experience, their answers have made the interviewer's eyes shine and provided us with valuable inspiration.
This story reminds us that when it comes to interviews, don't panic when you encounter strange questions, the key is to use your wits and personality to answer.
As Steve Jobs said, "Your job is to fill a large part of your life, and the only way to be truly satisfied is to do what you think is great." And great work is love for the work you do. ”
So, if you were an interviewer, which candidate's answers would you be more interested in? Or, if you were the interviewee, how would you answer this question? I look forward to seeing your wonderful answers in the comment area, let's ** the infinite possibilities of the workplace together!