Unjust, false and wrongly decided cases in the sense of truth mean that the truth is indeed what happened to this person, but the evidence in the case is really insufficient to judge what he is; Or the truth is that this person is not what he is, but the evidence in the case is very much like what this person is (the evidence in the case is essentially false, but there is no evidence to prove it), and he must be judged.
Judges adjudicate cases in accordance with the law, and it is mainly the judges who judge the case based on evidence. Once the evidence appears in the first paragraph, the correct handling of the judge can only follow this line, and the result may be unfair in essence. But at this time, there is no way, a certain party may have to suffer a dumb loss temporarily, or even a dumb loss for a long time.
This kind of unjust, false and wrongly decided case is actually a product of contradictions, which reflects the cruelty of litigation. For example, in a certain case, everyone knows that this person did it, according to the law, but it can't be judged; Or everyone thinks that he didn't do it, but the evidence all points to him, and he has to be sentenced according to the law. But the fact is that the former is the person, and the latter is not the person.
Summary: The awareness of evidence retention and risk prevention should not be less, so as to prevent the embarrassing situation of unspeakable.