Whip bull, on February 18, Hu Xijin just posted a comment on the Wensheng model SORA released by OpenAI a few days ago, saying that some people who say that SORA does not mean anything are too irresponsible.
OpenAI, an American artificial intelligence company, released SORA a few days ago, which can generate up to one minute of realism based on text descriptions, causing an industry shock.
The following is the full text of Hu Xijin's comments:
The release of the Wensheng ** model SORA by the American OpenAI company has shaken the global AI industry, and also caused many people in China to worry that our AI research has widened the distance from the United States. However, there are also some influential bloggers in China who denounce the above concerns as "shocking", claiming that there are many fields of AI, and the leading role of the American AI model is only one of the corners, which is not to be worried, and even accuses people who talk about the long-term impact of OpenAI's innovation from ChatGPT to SORA or "have not seen the world" or "have ulterior motives".
Lao Hu has always advocated that the ** field should be diverse, as part of diversity, I want to say that this kind of people who insist on saying that sora "doesn't mean anything" with their eyes open is too irresponsible, and they are pouring ecstasy soup into the majority of netizens in doing so. What is the difference between this and the Qing Dynasty's accusation that foreign goods are "strange and ingenious"?
Are large language models really unimportant? It doesn't matter, there are so many Chinese companies following suit! Those companies are the best high-tech companies in China, will they be more stupid than the bloggers who say it's just a small piece of AI?
Sora showcases the amazing ability of the Wensheng model to make imitations, and what's even more impressive is the speed at which AI-generated models can be advanced. It has only been less than a year and 3 months since the emergence of ChatGPT, and it is almost iterating by leaps. What will happen in the future, how to subvert and affect the face of many industries, isn't it worth our full attention, try our best to participate in and seize this trend, and resolutely not be left behind by it?
Yes, AI has many application areas and scenarios, which doesn't require some people to educate us on common sense, right? However, the generative model is the closest to the knowledge system and public life of ordinary people, the easiest to connect with the mass economy, attract people from all walks of life to use them to improve their working methods, and vigorously improve efficiency, their application scenarios are the most extensive, the most likely to drive the technological progress of all walks of life and the overall industrial revolution, and will also threaten a large number of general technical jobs, is this judgment wrong?
As far as Lao Hu knows, a large number of domestic textsmiths are already using large language models, and ChatGPT is generally reflected to have the best effect. Why should some people turn a blind eye to such facts, or deliberately deny them? China's AI-generated model is obviously lagging behind the United States, and no large language model has yet been able to catch up with ChatGPT4. Let's face up to the gap, shall we?
It is sometimes difficult to seek truth from facts, because it has to face our self-esteem and our defense of some real fait accompli. However, facing up to the gap does not mean losing confidence, and more often than not, it can lead to the determination and courage to catch up, and how to do it. The most terrible thing is that we do not dare to face the problem, and become numb in the self-comfort and intoxication that everything is ok or even good.
Lao Hu also believes that even if the sense of crisis is a little too much, it is also a little too much than complacency, and the actual harm caused in the end is often smaller. A big country and a big society like China will not give up on itself because of a sense of crisis. There has never been such a record in the history of New China, but we have really had the lessons of complacency and refusal to learn from the outside world.
In the end, Lao Hu wants to say that everyone wants to be good for the country, and express their opinions around AI, although the language used by each other is a bit intense, but this is the first field, I hope our society can finally accommodate such a dispute.