Putin critic Alexei N**Alny died in a cold prison in Siberia, and Western politicians and ** made a large number of speeches or comments, flattering words to the fullest, and some even called him a "martyr"; At the same time, Putin's death was also blamed, and Biden threatened to sanction Russia in retaliation.
The death of this politician has also become a topic of discussion in the United States. Democratic nominee Niki Haley slammed Trump's foreign policy, condemned the former for keeping silent about Alexey N**Alny's death, and labeled Trump an "Putin accomplice."
Last month, another person died in prison, an American, but the West remained silent. This is the American blogger and commentator Gonzalo Lira, who died in a Ukrainian prison.
You've probably never heard of Lira, who died after 8 months in a Ukrainian prison. His father issued a public statement in New York condemning the United States**, especially the U.S. Embassy in Kiev, for ignoring his son's plight. In the final handwritten note, Lira said he was even deprived of essential medicines.
Last year, Ukrainian authorities said that Lila had made "pro-Russian" statements and arrested him for "producing and disseminating materials justifying Russia's armed aggression against Ukraine."
Almost from the very beginning, the lira presented a point of view that was completely opposite to that of the West, when everyone was celebrating "Western unity", "the bravery and nobility of Ukraine" and Putin's inevitable defeat. When the lira gained more and more followers online, the United States began to constantly attack him viciously. He was called a "pro-Putin nursery" and a "useful idiot".
After the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, the lira turned its attention to the war. He argues that the "invasion" is not for nothing, but in response to the Western (NATO) invasion, and that Ukraine cannot win, nor can the West, led by Washington, which will once again wage a defeated, but extremely destructive, human war. Zelensky is as corrupt as any before him, he said.
Unsurprisingly, after Lira was imprisoned and died, the mainstream of the West was almost silent about him. Given Biden's influence on Ukraine, he could have easily escaped from prison. But Washington believes that this particularly troublesome American is not worth saving.
According to statistics from the Russian Satellite News Agency, after Lira's death, there were zero reports about him in seven mainstream Western countries, including the New York Times, the Washington Post, Bloomberg, CNN, the American Consumer News and Business Channel, Reuters and the BBC. On the contrary, in the two days since Navalny's death, these seven companies have published a total of 202 reports on the matter.
What's even stranger is that a Google search for "journalist who died in a Ukrainian prison" gives the result that it was Navalny. This is Google's way of manipulating search results to support Western narratives.
Both died in prison, so why was the West's response so different? For the West, Navalny's death is valuable. He was hailed by the West as a symbol of Russia's loss of democracy and became a stick against Putin.
The fact is that Navalny is an informant for MI6 and the CIA, a poison pill aimed at bringing down Putin.
In a 2012 episode, Navalny asked the British Intelligence Unit for $10 million to $20 million a year to launch a color revolution in Russia. That's why he's **. Especially considering that the CIA and MI6 are undermining Putin**, which is of great significance.
An American journalist died in a Ukrainian prison for telling the truth. A Russian died in a Russian prison for acting as a thug of a Western color revolution. The difference is in the reporting of the Western **, is this freedom of the press?