Joseph's quote reveals the difference between Chinese and American cultures, with Americans being self-centered and Chinese paying more attention to harmonious coexistence. China does not want to become a hegemon, but wants equality and peace in the world.
The United States, on the other hand, poses a threat to China and tries to control China through various means, but this will only be self-defeating.
The attitude of the United States towards Russia has always been based on containment. Politically and militarily, the United States sees Russia as a potential threat. They want to maintain their supremacy and constantly expand NATO to achieve this goal.
For the United States, the European Union is an important ally, but Russia is an enemy that needs to be contained. The United States wants to reinforce the need for NATO itself by demonstrating the Russian threat.
However, this attitude has undoubtedly increased tensions between the United States and Russia.
Russia's position in international affairs has always been in the spotlight, and its nuclear power is second only to the United States, posing a potential threat to the United States and its allies. The United States has been trying to weaken Russia's military power by provoking the Russia-Ukraine war.
At the same time, the United States uses the economic ties between Russia and Europe to provoke contradictions within Europe and weaken the economic power of the European Union in order to better control Europe. China, on the other hand, has always been seen as the main adversary of the United States.
Although on the surface, the focus of this struggle is on the United States, Russia and European countries, in reality, Russia is only a pawn in the hands of the United States, and its real target is always China.
In the face of the challenge of China's rise, how NATO responds to Russia as a pawn is crucial. While a direct co-optation of Russia would greatly enhance its military capabilities, it would also make the EU a difficult problem to deal with.
And directly suppressing Russia may force Russia to turn to China, posing a huge threat to the United States.
Well, ignoring Russia's developments will allow it to continue to maintain friendly relations with us, which, as Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said, are in the best period in a century.
Will the United States be concerned about this? All three options seem to be detrimental to the United States, and the United States can only choose one of the three that will do less damage, that is, let Europe accept Russia in order to alienate Sino-Russian relations.
Relations between China and the United States.
Vivek, the candidate of the United States, is so ambitious that even China on the other side of the Pacific can hear it.
He has said that if he were the United States, he would oppose Ukraine's accession to NATO, because then NATO and European countries would be less of a threat to Russia, which would be good news for Russia.
However, the American approach tends to be businessman-like, and instead of giving favors to others for no reason, they seek trades. Vivek's second half of the sentence demanded that Russia dissolve its military partnership with China, which put Russia in a dilemma.
However, the Russians, with their "axis" character, find it difficult to accept the control of the Americans. In the American view, if China and Russia join forces to form an alliance of nuclear powers, then the United States is in danger of disappearing, and they must act to "protect themselves".
The U.S. is pursuing a strategy of dealing with Russia first and then China, which they see as equivalent to a Chinese victory. Nikki Haley has said that if she is elected, the world will have more fun, because the United States is just around the corner from the world stage.
All the ** candidates see China as a huge enemy and smear China internationally. Nikki even claimed that China had spent more than half a century plotting to bring down the United States.
However, China has never tried to crush or control any country, China has the demeanor of a great power, and no country is more eager for peace than China.
Nikki's current behavior in the United States is obviously trying to use its strong influence to push China to the forefront, however, China is very calm about this and will choose to wait and see.
As long as the actions of the United States do not threaten China's national interests and people's interests, China will laugh it off. This shows that the U.S. candidates, without exception, see China as the biggest threat.
Under Biden's leadership, the United States has simplified the list of enemies in the "U.S. Strategy Report" from the original Russia and China to only one China.
Her name is Nikki, an energetic and charismatic female name.
The United States is approaching, and two candidates, Biden and Trump, stand out, and their campaign rhetoric reflects the wishes and needs of voters. Some believe that whoever is elected, the ultimate loser is likely to be China, so if they are elected, what strategy will China adopt to curb China's rise?
As the world's leading power, China is under tremendous pressure. Trump's simple and brutal tactics, including imposing steep tariffs on Chinese goods and removing China's most-favored-nation status, could lead to a disruption between China and the United States.
However, this approach has little impact on China. During the pandemic, the governor of New York publicly questioned, can't we even produce a single mask?
The United States ** is ignoring light industry for the sake of the development of the military-industrial complex, they may need to import certain goods, but if there is a smart country like India that can seize the opportunity to earn the difference, then the United States will suffer.
Biden advocates curbing China's emerging industries, which is actually an economic war. Although the economy has suffered, people are still alive. Therefore, people are more concerned about whether the United States will treat China as it treats Japan and engage in a hot war.
The recent Russia-Ukraine war is an example of how civilians are most likely to be injured if the United States carries out airstrikes, as the United States threatens a war between China and the United States in 2025.
In fact, the United States is not stupid, and their strategy is to send other countries on missions, such as sending Ukraine on Russia and Israel on the Middle East.
The history of the United States shows that they often choose to take advantage of the fisherman's profits.
The remarks of the four-star US general are nothing more than words on paper, and the United States will not launch a military strike against China if it is not absolutely sure. What they are really worried about is the threat to the United States from the joint efforts of China and Russia.
However, we adhere to the "three noes" principle in history and reality, that is, non-alignment, non-confrontation and non-targeting of third countries.
From ancient times to the present day, our country has never been allied with any country, because we are convinced of our own capabilities, and we understand that there are only interests and no real friends.
What a painful experience it would be to be betrayed by someone you trusted. China will never take any military action against the United States, provided that we avoid a recurrence of the McMahon Line, which does not mean that we will tolerate territorial violations.
In our eyes, the United States is just a clown who sees China as an imaginary enemy, because China's development threatens its economic development. However, this is the necessary stage of social development, and it is also the direction we should strive for.
in U.S.-China relations'Thucydides Trap'Stemming from a strategic miscalculation. Our leadership is intellectual, but there has never been such a figure in the United States. We will do everything we can to avoid a deterioration in U.S.-China relations, and we need to wait and see what happens to the U.S. response. "