Both experts and policies are well aware that the current confidence and vitality of the private economy are seriously insufficient.
Why? The downward trend of private investment growth is still continuing, which of course has the background of the economic environment, and the deep-seated reason is that in the past ten years, the policies and systems have been standardized and orderly, in a specific environment, so that the private sector is deeply afraid, and private entrepreneurs are worried about being deprived of wealth.
If, as Professor Wei Jie said, this mistake is the "misunderstanding" of the policy by private entrepreneurs, then theoretically there should be a new formulation, and the source should be cleaned up as necessary. And what is confusing is that, on the contrary, the economic pressure is so great that this pressure seems to be presented in the form of the people, so that the private bosses can not find the north at all.
There is a heated discussion on the Internet: how to distinguish between entrepreneurs and capitalists?
How about being an entrepreneur? What about being a capitalist? The raising of such a question is already a kind of ideological distortion and a deviation between theory and reality.
Under the conditions of a market economy, all private capital that employs labor is without exception capitalists; This is the positioning of the classical theory, it is clear. Ren Zhengfei is, so is Cao Dewang, Ma Yun has now withdrawn from the actual controller, if he is more complete and withdraws from all the shares, then he will take off the hat of a capitalist. So, what is the point of the discussion, a return to the planned economy? Of course, as long as the economy can develop at a high speed, as long as the positioning of the whole people is really as follows the logic of Professor Zhang Weiwei, it is really owned by everyone, and it is the real property rights of the people.
The most popular perception in society is still inseparable from the theory of private departure.
Therefore, I have always emphasized that Wu Xiaoping's exit theory is not his invention, he is just telling a fact, a theoretical fact, and a realistic fact. Our current positioning of the private economy has not erased the shadow of "expediency", and the discrimination against the private sector on the Internet is as always.
In all fairness, the policy has actually touched on all the specific problems in the current reality of the private sector, and has also set up special management bureaus for the private economy, such as market access, equal market position, financing costs, long-term arrears, and law enforcement, but there is a lack of results. The problem of long-term arrears and triangular debts has also happened in the past, when the willows and flowers were clear in a month, and now it is still thundering and raining. Lao Hu said that it is necessary to sing about China's economy, no problem, and solve all kinds of problems in the private economy.
We all know very well that the year of China's economy is a time window for the convergence of various contradictions, all problems have reached the margin, real estate must be reversed, debts must be resolved, foreign trade must be opened, everywhere is a dilemma, everywhere is an impossible triangle; But I believe that there is nothing more iconic than the improvement of the private economy.
Because the private sector is the chassis of China's economy and the chassis of people's livelihood.
Huang Qifan said that the transformation of China's economy needs to increase the middle-income group by 400 million, which is equivalent to saying that to increase the number of jobs by 400 million, this increase is the increase of the market, not through national investment, at the cost of debt to increase, only when private capital and foreign capital pour into the market, it is realistic; That is, it is necessary to rebuild the confidence of private capital, and not to discuss who is the capitalist and who is the entrepreneur? That's not going to talk about 400 million jobs.
There are too many elements for China's economic recovery, and the biggest must is the resurgence of the private economy.
Some people say that history has only two years left for China's economy to turn over, and I accept this statement, which will surely become a major turning point in history. What is Advance? The economic work conference is positioned to seek progress while maintaining stability, but the economy is dynamic, and it cannot be stable without progress.
Who is the living water of China's economy: private enterprises.