College teachers are no longer an opportunity to go to graduate school? It is not recommended for ordinary students from two colleges and universities to take the postgraduate examination
As a university professor, I used to encourage many students to go to graduate school. However, the changes in recent years have given me a new perspective on this. I began to think that the input-output ratio of the graduate school entrance examination was too low.
In short, I don't recommend the average student of the second university to go to graduate school again. Of course, students who excel in all aspects can be said otherwise.
Unlike the gaokao, which only has a written test, and everyone uses the same test method. But graduate school entrance exams involve interviews, and each school and each major is very different.
The college entrance examination may be an opportunity for many people, but for ordinary students in two universities, the postgraduate entrance examination is no longer an opportunity.
Some self-esteem are still encouraging graduate school entrance examinations, and you can see what their motivations are. The words they say sound not only beautiful but also full of praise and inspiration. In short, what if the dream comes true? Do you ask if the melons that sell melons are sweet? If the probability is too low, then there is no value and meaning in the discussion.
After all, there is also the possibility of making a fortune by buying lottery tickets.
For those netizens who contradicted me, many of them may not have carefully read what I wrote at all, and just read the title and commented. I hope you read what I said before commenting. 
It seems that the gold content of the graduate school entrance examination is gradually decreasing, but at the same time, the complexity of the examination is showing a trend of increasing.
This year, the number of graduate students applying for the graduate school is huge, and every school can take it in stride, so schools have put various rules in place to protect their own interests. It is normal and inevitable that there are differences in the graduate school entrance examination, but the differences in this year's examination are extraordinarily significant. Each school has unique characteristics that can be difficult to understand for outsiders or those who lack experience from previous years. For some candidates, it becomes extremely difficult to obtain accurate information.
Take one candidate as an example, before registering, he found out that there has been a major adjustment in the subjects of this year's exam, and one exam has changed from one in the past to four. She rushed to work on her remaining three courses, but her grades were not satisfactory and she failed to make it to the interview. Many may think this is fair, as the vast majority of test takers are unaware of this adjustment. However, in fact, most people have already known about it.
So, is this candidate aware of this adjustment? In fact, she knew that this news had been rumored two or three years ago, but she didn't know if it was true. Who is more likely to know the authenticity of a message? It is clear that those who have strong access to information, who have access to information and who are sensitive to it. This has become an insurmountable obstacle for some second-year students. For some, it's just a matter of **.
So why is the ability to access information poor? Either because you lack awareness of this, or because you don't fit into the circle of messaging. Although you can consult on the Internet and ask your brothers and sisters for advice, this kind of shallow information channel is of little significance. The lack of access to real information seems to be a matter of course.
The landscape of graduate school examinations is changing profoundly, and it is no longer an era where you can get good grades simply by studying hard. Just like the comparison between a traditional handicraft workshop and a modern industrial production line, the postgraduate entrance examination has developed in a more sophisticated and professional direction.
Imagine that the public course training for the postgraduate entrance examination is like a highly specialized production line, and each knowledge point is accurately deconstructed and professionally trained to ensure that every candidate can stand out in the exam.
Against this backdrop, the individualized differences of students seem to be less prominent, and more attention is paid to who is better able to execute the learning process. For those students from the second university, the challenge is not only the subject knowledge itself, but also how to effectively connect with this highly specialized examination system.
What is remarkable is that with the trend of specialization in postgraduate entrance examinations, high-scoring candidates emerge in an endless stream, and even candidates with more than 400 points abound. This makes it even more difficult for those students who are relatively disadvantaged to deal with it.
We are often told that if we work hard, we can achieve good results. However, for these disadvantaged students, no matter how much effort they put in, it is difficult to match those candidates who have good study habits and clear guidance.
If you want to stand out in this fierce competition for graduate school entrance examinations, you not only need to work hard, but also need to find a study method and strategy that suits you. For students who don't recognize this or lack guidance, they may still be working blindly and struggling to achieve the desired results.
The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.