Your concern will be my motivation, and your encouragement will be our motivation to move forward! Follow me and you will be able to read my recent blog post, "Blockade" and "Decoupling" of the US Strategy for China
Since the Trump administration, the United States has been implementing a set of blockade policies against China, especially in the areas of high technology. In order to prevent China's growth and development, the United States not only launched a first-class war, but also blockaded China's semiconductor industry to restrict the development of China's high and new technology. From the above behavior, we can see that the United States' opposition to China's "ban on any change" actually shows its growing anxiety and apprehension about China, and it wants to work with other countries to put pressure on China in order to contain its development.
However, when the United States tried to "decouple" from China, it did not intend to "disconnect", on the contrary, it replaced the "decoupling theory" with the word "de-risking". However, judging from the "Indo-Pacific region" promoted by the United States, the United States is trying to build a trading system that excludes China, which is a special manifestation of the "decoupling theory". The United States talks about "decoupling," but in practice, it has been trying to "separate" from China, and such a contradictory attitude makes it easy to see the real purpose of the United States.
The United States wants to "separate" from the outside world, but it is difficult to do so.
The U.S. "decoupling war" against China did not achieve the desired results, as it is one of the largest semiconductor industries in the world. For example, the F35 Lightning II fighter jet of the American Lockheed Martin is also subject to China's constraints. According to news reports, the U.S. Air Force has recently said that the United States cannot completely dissociate itself from China because the F-35 fighter jets must import magnetic parts from China.
What's more, most of the metal elements used in the receiving parts of the active phased array antennas of the F-35 fighters were imported from China. Because China has the world's leading gallium smelting and export capacity, Lockheed Martin must rely on China's gallium raw materials in order to continue to manufacture F-35 fighters. Therefore, although the United States has been working hard to promote the "separation" from China, it has never been able to completely achieve the goal of "decoupling" due to the supply of important parts in the Chinese industry.
This situation reflects the current situation of the art industry. The United States wants to contain China's economic growth, but at the same time it must rely on China to import vital parts and raw materials. It can be said that when the United States forbade China to make any changes, China used its own power to choke the United States by the throat, forcing the United States to admit in front of the public that there was no way for it and China to be completely separated.
America's dilemma and its costs.
The United States has always been the promoter of global economic development, but now, it has gone the opposite way, suppressing and blockading China in all aspects. However, the US "blockade" and "separation" from China are based on "unsuccessful," and "if you don't succeed, you will be benevolent."
First of all, while the United States is trying to "separate" itself from China, it has also become seriously dependent on China, which will not only expose the defects of American industry, but will also affect the reputation and credibility of the United States in the world.
Second, since China has strong international competitiveness, the constraints on China will inevitably have an adverse impact on the technology industry of the entire world. The "blockade" measures adopted by the United States around the world are likely to hinder the world's scientific and technological progress and adversely affect the stability and development of the world economy.
Third, this move by the United States has partially promoted the process of multipolarization in the world, and some other countries are also likely to strengthen sanctions and suppression of the United States. The United States is trying to contain China's development through "blockade" and "decoupling", but it is difficult to predict that such a move will make the world situation more serious, and then lead to the instability of the world's economic and political ties.
In short, the essence of the U.S. strategy to prevent China's transformation is to contain China's growth and rise, but its "decoupling" from China has put itself in trouble. U.S. Deputy Hunter has made it clear that it is impossible for the United States to completely break away from China. This reflects the impracticality and high cost of the US blockade plan. As China continues to rise and the world map changes, it will be interesting to see whether the United States will be able to change its strategy and reevaluate China.
As long as you are here, you can get the freshest and freshest information, you can keep pace with the world, and grasp the direction of fashion development! I will remember every bit of you; I love everything you say.