The school denied bullying, and Hao Shaowen used the public effect to exert pressure and threw out multiple pieces of evidence
Follow me and I'll be sharing some interesting stories and experiences on a regular basis and exchanging educational experiences!
The school statement: denies bullying and accuses Hao Shaowen of using public effect to exert pressure.
1.The incident of Hao Shaowen's daughter was clarified by the school: through a monitoring investigation, the school determined that the incident was just a joke between classmates, not a school bullying.
2) The school accused Mr. and Mrs. Hao of taking advantage of the celebrity effect to hype up a series of exams and deliberately make a big fuss in an attempt to exert pressure on the public.
3.The school issued a 3,000-word statement to refute the rumors, but the Hao Shaowen couple still did not accept a private apology and demanded that the school expel the bullies.
4) Some netizens questioned Hao Shaowen's behavior, believing that she used the Internet to forcibly threaten the school and commit online violence against young children, which is real bullying.
5.Under public pressure, school authorities decided to publicly call on netizens to analyze the problem from multiple angles and objectively.
Further developed and described:
The university's statement sparked widespread discussion and controversy. The issue was compounded by the school's denial of Hao's complaint. Some supported the university's position, arguing that the surveillance findings provided by the university were objective. They questioned Hao Shaowen's behavior, arguing that she used her celebrity status and public ** to try to make personal gains from the incident. However, some netizens expressed skepticism about the school's statement, believing that it was just a response from the school to protect its reputation.
Netizens' different views: differences in attitudes towards universities and Hao Shaowen.
1.Netizens who supported the school's response believed that the school conducted an investigation into the surveillance footage and determined that the incident was not a school bullying based on the results of the investigation, which is an objective and fair performance.
2) These netizens questioned Hao Shaowen's position and behavior on this matter, saying that she used the Internet to force and threaten the school to expel a third-grade child, and let netizens ** children in cyberspace, which constituted real bullying.
3.Another group was skeptical of the school's response, believing that the school was not really addressing the issue. They asked the school to publish the first evidence of the incident to prove that the school's conclusions were correct.
4.These netizens felt that the school authorities did not recognize the existence of bullying and questioned the school's perception and handling of the problem of school bullying.
Further developed and described:
The school's response sparked different opinions and comments from netizens. Some netizens supported the school's conclusions and believed that the school was fair and objective. They questioned the behavior of Hao Shaowen and his wife, believing that they wanted to use their fame and ** effect to put pressure on the school to get more attention and benefits. However, there are also those who are skeptical and questionable about the school's response. They argued that the school had not really solved the problem and demanded that the school release video evidence from the time to justify its conclusions.
School's view: Insist that this is not bullying and present counter-evidence.
1.The school emphasizes the investigation of the incident: the school conducted a detailed investigation of the incident using CCTV footage and concluded that it was just a joke between classmates and that there was no bullying on campus.
2.The school advises netizens to analyze the problem from multiple perspectives: The school calls on netizens to analyze the incident with an objective attitude, not to believe the words of one party, but to analyze and judge the problem objectively.
3.The school responded to questions raised by netizens: the school emphasized that it did not deliberately conceal the facts, but did not release specific evidence in order to protect the privacy and rights of other children.
4) Maintaining the school's image: The school said that the school has always been committed to providing students with a good education and learning environment, and will not tolerate bullying on campus, let alone cover up lies.
Further developed and described:
The school insisted that the incident was not school bullying and presented the results of the investigation and evidence to refute Hao. Based on the investigation of the TV footage, the school believes that it was just an inadvertent push between classmates, and there was no malicious bullying. At the same time, the school also suggested that netizens analyze the problem from multiple angles and objectively, not to believe one-sided words, but to make comprehensive analysis and judgment. In response to netizens' questions about the school's failure to release specific evidence, the school explained that the school did not deliberately conceal the facts, but to protect the privacy and rights of other children. Finally, the university emphasized that they are committed to providing a good education and learning environment for their students, and are committed to never tolerating bullying in schools or hiding the truth.
The disagreement between the university and Hao Shaowen: the difference in understanding the problem.
1) Hao Shaowen insists that her daughter was bullied: Hao Shaowen has always insisted that her daughter was bullied and said that other parents also shared the same view about the school's failure to deal with the situation.
2.Hao Shaowen pressured the school to be expelled"Scholars": Hao Shaowen did not ask the school to apologize privately, but asked for the so-called expulsion"Scholars"and use ** to put pressure on the school to achieve their own goals.
3) The school stressed that it was not bullying: The school argued that the incident was just a careless push between colleagues and that there was no bullying as the school claimed.
4.School authorities are committed to maintaining the school's image: School authorities maintain the reputation and image of the school and are reluctant to admit that bullying exists in the school because it can have a negative impact on the school's reputation.
Further developed and described:
Hao Shaowen and the school have a clear difference of opinion on this matter. Hao Shaowen has always believed that her daughter was a victim of bullying and said that she had spoken to other parents who shared the same view of the school's handling of the situation. Her demand was not a private apology, but the expulsion of the so-called"Bullies"。Hao Shaowen tried to achieve his goal through ** pressure. The school stressed that the incident was just a casual quarrel between students, not an act of intimidation as stated by the school. The school said that the school has always worked hard to protect the rights and interests of students, but also wants to protect the school's image and reputation. As a result, school authorities are reluctant to admit that bullying exists on campus because it can negatively impact the school's reputation.
Personal thoughts and summaries.
In understanding this incident, I believe that the controversy and different views between Hao Shaowen and the school reflect the differences in the understanding and handling of the problem of school bullying between the two sides. For Hao Shaowen, as a representative of a famous family, she not only cares about her children, but also hopes to arouse the society's attention and attention to the problem of school bullying through her behavior. She uses her fame and ** to her advantage, hoping to put pressure on the school and force the school to take action by **. However, the school insisted with facts and evidence that the incident was just a fight between classmates and not a school bullying. They stressed that the school has always been committed to providing a good learning environment for students and promised not to tolerate bullying in schools. Different positions and perspectives complicate matters and confuse people in determining the truth and seeking justice.
In conclusion, school bullying is a serious problem that should be taken seriously and dealt with in a timely manner. Both schools and parents must take a proactive approach to ensure the safety and well-being of students. When dealing with similar incidents, the principles of objectivity, impartiality and transparency should be followed, and the opinions and evidence of all parties should be fully considered, and reasonable and effective investigation and resolution should be conducted. At the same time, the public should also maintain a rational and objective attitude, not believe or spread rumors, understand and analyze the situation from multiple angles, and make fair judgments. The competent authorities should also strengthen the prevention and intervention of school bullying to provide students with a healthy and harmonious school environment. Only by working together can we effectively solve the problem of school bullying.
Your attention is the driving force for me to move forward, and your support is the direction for me to move forward. Follow me and you can see my latest articles, hear my unique insights and in-depth analysis on a variety of topics, and let's explore the ocean of knowledge together!