Why is the pension of the career department higher than that of the administrative department?There are many reasons why the retirement pension of the business establishment is more generous than that of the administrative establishment. First of all, career establishment usually requires employees to have deeper professional knowledge and skills in a specific field or industry, so their pension level reflects a recognition and incentive for professionals. Secondly, the business establishment invests more resources in recruitment and training, and is committed to cultivating the professionalism and vocational skills of employees, which improves the overall quality of employees to a certain extent, and is one of the reasons for the better pension treatment.
Employees with career development often face more fierce market competition and professional challenges, and their career development path may be more tortuous. In order to retain talents in the fierce competition for careers, providing competitive pensions has become an important policy for career establishment.
In addition, career establishment often involves a higher level of management and decision-making, and employees need to take on greater responsibility and pressure. Therefore, in order to attract and retain high-quality professionals, it is inevitable to offer a generous pension package. In contrast, the administrative establishment may be more focused on grassroots management, with relatively light job responsibilities and therefore relatively low pension levels.
In general, the phenomenon of higher pensions for business establishments is the result of a combination of factors, reflecting the difference in the importance and incentive mechanism for professionals.
Many people generally believe that the pension of the occupational department is more generous than that of the administrative pension, that is, the pension of employees of occupational units is more superior than the pension of civil servants. However, this view may only be based on the superficial perception of individual social circles, and is not supported by comprehensive analysis and surveys across the country. In my familiar social circles, there are indeed many employees of professional units whose pensions are higher than those of government employees.
But this is only a superficial sensation, or a local phenomenon. In practice, the occupations we have seen, especially the civil servants with whom we have close contact, are mainly civil servants in positions or ranks at the county level and below. On the contrary, around us, it is relatively easy to come into contact with professional editors with senior titles above the deputy high school. From this point of view, the pension of the professional department is generally higher than that of the administrative department, and this trend does exist.
Due to the nature of each person's work, the working environment and the job position, the social circles we are involved in are also very different. In the case of provincial-level agencies, for example, employees there have easier access to department-level cadres, and department-level cadres are also quite common. The pensions of cadres at the department level are basically more than 10,000 yuan, which is beyond the reach of employees in many professional units. Therefore, on the premise of fully understanding the various factors, we can more accurately assess the difference between professional and administrative pensions. It should be noted that for the authenticity of this issue, a comprehensive analysis and investigation is needed in order to judge the actual differences between the two more scientifically.
Individuals working in county towns usually have close interactions with county-level leaders, and have relatively few opportunities to interact with department-level managers. Their usual social circles are mainly gathered between township managers and employees of county-level public institutions. Although the retirement pension of grassroots civil servants is generally not very rich, for example, the pension of township managers is generally about 5,000 yuan to 6,000 yuan, but among the civil servants in the county, the monthly pension of about 6,000 yuan accounts for the vast majority.
In the county, in addition to civil servants, people have the most contact with educators, medical staff, and other public institution workers. Although the county is relatively small, with only a few tens of thousands of people, there are as many as 1,000 civil servants and employees in public institutions, among which educators and medical personnel occupy a dominant position in public institutions.
Among the employees of public institutions in counties and townships, a considerable number of individuals have worked for more than 30 years, and there are not a few individuals with deputy senior titles. For example, associate senior educators in primary and secondary schools, deputy chief doctors in the medical field, and individuals with associate senior titles in agriculture, forestry, water and other industries are often our relatives, friends or classmates. Once retired, the level of retirement pension for individuals with deputy senior professional titles in all public institutions generally exceeds that of section-level managers of government organs, and sometimes even comparable to that of managers at the deputy department level. This concept is widely accepted locally.
Since October 1, 2014, government agencies and institutions have begun to be included in the pension insurance system. Under this system, the employee's contribution base is based on the individual's actual salary. When civil servants enjoy salaries and benefits, they are calculated according to their positions; The staff of public institutions enjoy remuneration according to different positions, according to management positions or professional and technical positions.
When going through the retirement procedures, whether it is a civil servant or a staff member of a public institution, it is necessary to consider the relatively long period of deemed contributions. When determining the deemed contribution index, factors such as position, rank, and professional and technical titles will be taken into account. Ordinary civil servants, even civil servants at the township level, tend to have a lower deemed contribution index than that of professional and technical personnel above the deputy high level.
Inspecting grass-roots positions, individuals with intermediate or above professional and technical titles are more superior than those of civil servants in terms of post salary and salary scale. Among the grassroots civil servants, the number of people in leadership positions is relatively scarce and the ranks are relatively low. Therefore, in terms of the payment base, the contribution salary of most civil servants is lower than that of the staff of local public institutions with middle and senior technical titles.
The implementation of this system has led to the difference in pay between different levels and positions in terms of retirement benefits, providing employees with more choices and incentives. However, beyond cognition is rational analysis, which is the embodiment of a system.
In the widely accepted belief, it is generally accepted that the level of pension for the career department is relatively high, compared to the administrative level. This perception is influenced by a number of factors, including geographical differences and social circles, as well as the limitations of the nature of work at the grassroots level.
First of all, regional differences play a key role in the difference in the level of pensions between the public and administrative employees. The economic situation and social welfare policies in different regions can lead to differences in pensions. This suggests that the impact of geographical location needs to be taken into account when assessing the level of treatment between the two.
Secondly, the differences in social circles also affect people's perceptions of the treatment of career editors and administrative editors to a certain extent. As people obtain information and experience in different social environments, different perceptions of pension levels are formed. This makes the formation of ideas more complex, influenced by the individual's social circle.
In addition, the peculiarities of the nature of grassroots work are also important reasons for this perception. Public institutions emphasize professional skills, so they pay more attention to the contributions and abilities of individuals in the professional field when assessing retirement benefits. On the contrary, the pension of the administrative staff is mainly constrained by the rank of the post and may not fully reflect the professional level of the individual. This difference in institutions leads to a relatively high trend in the pension level of career staff in the grassroots work environment.
Therefore, taking into account the regional differences, the influence of social circles and the particularity of the nature of grassroots work, it is understandable why it is generally believed that the pension level of the career editor may be higher than that of the administrative department at the same level.
When examining the cognition of pension level, it is not only directly affected by the nature of the work of the career editor and the administrative editor, but also by the comprehensive shaping of many factors such as region, social and system.
Therefore, we must recognize that in this diversified context, the view of pension levels should take into account the combined impact of various factors more comprehensively.