Teachers should start the withdrawal mechanism in many places, and netizens Civil servants should implement the withdrawal mechanism first!
Many places have begun to implement the retirement system for teachers, netizens: First of all, we must implement the retirement system for civil servants!
Although the editorial fever is still difficult to cool, in recent years, the field of education has been undergoing continuous reforms. First of all, the county management school is hired, and now many places are in the first place to withdraw from the teacher's mechanism, it seems that teachers will be the focus of reform.
A few days ago, the work meeting of the Beijing Education Development Committee of Fengtai District clearly stated that by 2024, the district will strengthen the annual evaluation of teachers, apply the results to practice, and explore the establishment and improvement of the exit mechanism of the teaching team. Prior to this, Ningbo City in Zhejiang Province, Guiyang City in Guizhou Province, and Pingyin County in Shandong Province had similar measures. However, there are different views from all walks of life on the implementation of the mechanism.
The main arguments against the teacher withdrawal mechanism are:
First, educators are currently paid very little. If the exit system is implemented, will there be more outstanding talents entering the education sector? Although most people think that the benefits of ordinary teachers are better, only those who are engaged in this profession know that teachers' salaries are not as good as they think, especially in many small places, where teachers' salaries are still very low. If the teacher withdrawal system is really implemented, it will be difficult to attract good teachers in those areas.
Many people, especially women, now tend to work as educators, due to the teaching system and a more stable career structure. If all these systems are abolished, who will be in the future? If education fails to retain talents, it will only be our students who will suffer in the end.
Secondly, in terms of teachers, the healthy development of young children must have a stable teaching team to ensure the stability of the teaching team and will not affect the children's academics. In many countries, the profession of a teacher as a public official is relatively stable. The implementation of the teacher withdrawal system will endanger the stability of the teaching force.
If a large number of teachers leave before the start of the semester, then the school will suddenly face a shortage of teachers; If a large group of teachers leave in the middle of the job, then there is a chance that there will be no one to teach. The professionalism of the educational sector cannot be ignored, and it is unlikely to be replaced by some students who have graduated from universities. If every school has the same problem, then students will face the embarrassing situation of not having a teacher to teach.
In order to promote the healthy development of young people, it is necessary to have a good teacher-student relationship. If your child changes teachers frequently, the results are conceivable!
Point 3: Why can only a teacher be a member of an organization?Why are civil servants not in this range?That's unfair, isn't it?
In fact, it's not that the education community doesn't support the withdrawal of students, but it doesn't like the withdrawal of teachers. If all people are public utilities, why don't retirees include civil servants and other occupations?Aren't the employees in other industries quite good?
In the education sector, teachers are a relatively vulnerable group, and in the education sector, the hardest working people are front-line teachers. However, from the current point of view, the teacher exit mechanism is mainly concentrated on front-line teachers, rather than educational leaders, principals and middle managers. Why do you want to leave people who do a good job in practice?Will this be a disappointment for the front-line teachers?
In fact, in any profession, including in the field of education, there will always be laymen. Even if the withdrawal system is to be implemented, it should be implemented in other industries at the same time, and teachers should not be targeted.
Finally, the author has a strong opposition to the withdrawal system of teachers. Teachers should have a certain degree of stability. In addition, constant pressure on teachers is not good for children. Put too much pressure on the teacher and they will pass the pressure on to the students. If the withdrawal system is implemented, then teachers risk putting pressure on students to keep their jobs. When the time comes, our children will suffer.
Teachers don't need to make them suffer more now, they just need to decompress and decompress. When the educational environment is stable, teachers can concentrate on teaching.
What do you think about this?Share it!
The author of this article has no intentions, nor does it have any intentions regarding any country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The information provided in this ** does not mean that it agrees or agrees with any laws, rules, opinions, actions, or is responsible for the correctness of the information contained therein. The author of the article is not responsible for the above or related issues, and does not assume any legal responsibility.