Most of NATO's top ** equipment has been transported to the battlefield in eastern Ukraine, and the result is not Russia's opponent at all. The M1A1 tank supported by the United States did not overturn in the end because its performance was better than other tanks.
And just because it is the latest, the United States provided Ukraine with a total of only 31 M1A1 main battle tanks, and in the past few days, two have been gone, it seems that it will not be more than half a year, and it will have to be re-aided.
According to the policy of the Russian army, the first kill of a Western main battle tank will be rewarded with 10 million rubles, and the latter will be rewarded with 1 million, and the Russian soldiers promise to give Biden a 10% bonus as a commission for every successful destruction of an M1 tank.
Recently, the Russian army has killed 2 M1A1 tanks, STRV 122 main battle tanks, and archers 155mm truck guns, three major artifacts of NATO's assistance to Ukraine, breaking the myth of the West's invincibility and dispelling NATO's arrogance.
How the first M1A1 died: As soon as the US M1A1 Abrams tank appeared on the battlefield of Avdeyevka, it was discovered by the front-line Russian reconnaissance drone, and then launched the FPV drone to attack, and then destroyed.
The second M1A1 died: first blow up the tracks of the tank with RPG rockets to make the tank lie down, and then bombard the top of the tank with a suicide drone, showing that the top of the tank was scorched.
Introduction: On the current battlefield in Ukraine, NATO's top equipment has been unveiled, but in the face of Russia's formidable opponents, they have not shown the advantages they deserve.
Conclusion: These events not only shocked and worried NATO countries, but also called for a re-examination of existing strategies and equipment deployments to better meet future challenges.
The recent Russia-Ukraine battlefield has shown a remarkable change: tanks are no longer just being eliminated in an environment of confrontation. Nowadays, in modern warfare, the goal of tanks is no longer limited to finding the opponent's tank.
Rather, it is necessary to guard against and strike at various targets, forcing tanks on the battlefield to expose their weaknesses in addition to tank warfare. In the current battlefield environment, systematic combat has become the king of tanks.
Heavy armor would undoubtedly be a suicidal act if it remained in individual combat mode. Even if it is a main battle tank, even if it is to hand over NATO's advanced ** systems such as F22, F35, Apache, etc. to the Ukrainian army.
It is still difficult to resist the threat of systematic war systems, which will be destroyed one by one, and in the past, Western equipment usually mocked the Russian-made ** with fancy configurations and all kinds of eye-catching data"Stupid, big black and coarse"。
However, the wisdom of the Slavs proved to be not to be underestimated. Tens of thousands of dollars in NATO** are powerless in a near-transparent high-intensity war, while a few hundred drones can easily solve the problem.
Therefore, the Russian-style **, which has a simple structure and is easy to produce quickly on a large scale, has become a sharp weapon specially used to restrain NATO's "invincible myth"**.
In general, the evolution of the war has radically changed the role of tanks on the battlefield. The importance of systematic operations is undoubtedly highlighted, and the Russian-style ** has shown an advantage that many people have unexpected in such a war environment.
In this changing situation, we have to re-evaluate and understand the various systems in modern warfare.