Can China silence tens of millions of vehicles across the United States? What is the meaning behind Raimondo's radical rhetoric? Raimondo joins forces with Biden, does the false accusation against Chinese cars portend a bigger scheme?
Hua Chunying's rebuttal to the point, pointing directly at the pain points of the US side, what is the meaning of her words? According to the "Observer Network", citing the United States, U.S. Secretary of Commerce Raimondo in a recent interview made baseless slanders against China's auto industry, and even falsely called it a threat
In interviews, he likened cars to "silent mobile data collectors" in an attempt to stoke panic.
Raimondo's rhetoric is full of absurd imaginations that 3 million cars could be powered off on American roads at the same time, claiming that Chinese-made cars are driving on American roads and transmitting data to China every moment.
This remark has attracted questions from many Western users on social **. Raimondo's view, which seems to be unusual, actually reflects the current mindset in Washington and the deep imprint of Biden's China policy.
Interestingly, while shouting the slogan of "decoupling China", the United States is unwilling to give up mutually beneficial cooperation with China. While Raimondo was keen to hype up the "China threat theory", U.S. Ambassador to China Burns made it clear at a dinner in Beijing that senior U.S. officials, including Biden, Blinken, Raimondo and Yellen, all emphasized their desire to continue to cooperate with China.
The words and deeds of US Ambassador to China Burns revealed the delicate balance of Sino-US relations, and he reflected the dual mentality of the United States in the economic and trade fields. Knowing its close economic ties with China and the importance of China as a manufacturing giant, the United States is reluctant to cut ties easily because it is beyond its means.
However, they see China as a potential threat to hegemony, especially in the field of technology, which worries the United States that it could undermine its dominance. As a result, the United States has adopted a containment strategy in key areas of competition and has sought cooperation in industries that are closely linked to its own interests, such as those with low value-added and dependence on China.
The cooperation model that the United States adheres to has always been dominated by its own national interests, rather than equal mutual benefit and win-win results. Biden's remarks, such as his tough stance on Chinese cars, and even elevating it to the level of ***, fully expose this policy orientation.
Raimondo's behavior is nothing more than a clumsy performance to cater to Biden's position.
Chinese spokesperson Hua Chunying responded-for-tat to Biden's false accusations against Chinese cars. She subtly questioned on Twitter, suggesting that smartphones, cars and airplanes produced by the United States could also be a risk of data leakage and manipulation, and whether the United States was concerned that even its own technology could be remotely manipulated.
Hua Chunying reminded us that we can't look at things narrowly, just like we can't just look at all problems from the perspective of a hammer. After the Huawei, cranes and even garlic incidents, the automotive industry has once again become the so-called in the United States"***"Focus of attention.
Despite Biden's verbal emphasis"No decoupling", but in fact they are known to"***"as an excuse to continue to promote technological isolation from China. Behind this overreaction is the hegemonic mentality, anti-China bias, and unease and anxiety about the limitations of its own capabilities in the face of emerging challenges.
China in"Decarbonization"The counterattack in the process not only reveals the game behind this energy revolution, but also countermeasures to the strategic tactics that the United States and the West are trying to use as stumbling blocks to development.
It was supposed to be subject to"Decarbonization"China, which is under pressure, has quietly become a key force in the global energy innovation arena with the astonishing rise of the energy transition, which is beyond the expectations of the United States.
The United States is trying to take advantage of the advantages of traditional technology to transform, but the reality is that Tesla is alone, and other giants are either weak in transformation or costly, and it is difficult to compete.
With the loss of initiative on the issue and the emergence of competitive disadvantages, the United States has had to tear through the camouflage and interfere with the rules of the free market with force, showing a dramatic reversal of the power structure in this energy revolution.
When the United States, the world's sole superpower, rests on its laurels in traditional protectionism and evades rather than embraces competition, its self-isolation is doomed to inevitable decline.
Today, the United States is trying to follow the same strategy it used to treat Japan and Germany in a vain attempt to contain China"Second in the world"The rise of . However, China's strength is pluralistic and follows an internal logic, with complete autonomy and strength not to be underestimated to defend its rights and interests.
Therefore, any attempt to block China's rise will only end in failure.