The other day, I read an article titled "How many x crimes does this fairy tale hide?" article. After opening it, there is a strong feeling of suffocation!
The opening is: Is the Cowherd a hooligan? The prince in Sleeping Beauty is a ** criminal? And if it's the ugly girl who falls asleep? They said that in the story of the Cowherd and the Weaver Girl, the Cowherd is a thief + ** madness, and it should be changed to a hooligan and a weaver girl.
The prince of Sleeping Beauty kisses a woman who has lost consciousness, which is **. The selfless dedication of "Tianluo Girl" is a PUA from male power. Snow White's laundry, cooking, and making her bed are set as a moral judgment for women: kind, docile women are rewarded, and women with ambition and lust are punished.
Even at the end, they shouted, "When the women pick up the pen, when the women open their mouths, when the old stories are retold, everything is so different." Then, swapping the genders in fairy tales, it came to the conclusion that fairy tales, which are carriers of universal cultural myths (such as sexism), are a huge gender bias.
Is there anything wrong? The arguments calling for sexism and equality between men and women are filled with more of an emotion: extreme! Excessive extremism and antagonism have reduced gender issues to two extremes of black and white, while ignoring the complexity and diversity involved, including the variability of the historical environment.
You can criticize the limitations of the times in the old stories, but you must not stand on the height of today's morality and define it as dross with a simple "gender"! And it is such a text, just by grasping "emotions" and "opposites", it has 10+ million readers.
Some time ago, Jia Ling's inspirational remake of the movie "Hot and Hot" has been high on the hot search, and has achieved a good result of 3.4 billion box office! Subsequently, this movie ushered in an overwhelming low score! Douban 78 points, Tiger Pounce 35 points.
Many viewers scored low marks on this movie, thinking that Jia Ling's **100 pounds caters to the aesthetics of "white and thin", and is "trafficking women's body anxiety", which aggravates female infighting and female "female competition". Some people believe that in terms of the "adaptive creation" of the movie plot, Jia Ling is even more detached from the masses: the fat otaku girl has not worked for 10 years, and she can still take her ex-boyfriend and girlfriends to drink and hang out; The waitress of the barbecue restaurant on the ground floor with a monthly salary of 2,500 yuan and a rent of 800 yuan still has the energy to go to the gym to practice boxing after work, and successfully **100 pounds; beat up the owner of the barbecue restaurant who paid his salary, but it did not affect his livelihood at all, and he could still challenge himself in the ring;
Some people also think: A 5-point remake movie is blown to 10 points; A 10-minute Jia Ling** vlog dragged on for 2 hours. Some people even say that "Hot and Hot" is just an inspirational film that Jia Ling is moved by herself, nothing more. In the face of such an evaluation, of course, some people were unwilling, and stood up as soon as possible, and said angrily: Netizens are doing everything possible to argue the evil of this work, just to cover a woman's mouth, this is an out-and-out movement to belittle women's creation.
It seems that we can easily win this war by simply and crudely labeling one thing as "gender antagonism". But, girls, you see, we have instinctively put ourselves in the position of a vulnerable group or a victim.
Ask yourself, if this movie doesn't use "**" as a gimmick, how many viewers are willing to pay for it? An actor, whether it is for the role ** or gaining weight, is a professional attitude, it is like a professional athlete who trains hard for good results and good rankings, these are the foundation of the profession, and it is the person who is in it should do and must do. If this can also be used as a gimmick, then the game is meaningless, and playing the "emotional card" and "inspirational card" can cover up its own flaws and shortcomings.
I foolishly think that a female director is the elite of society, and her every move is very likely to affect the behavior and cognition of other women. When will the whole society, especially as us women ourselves, no longer talk about the so-called "inspirational" things such as marriage and anti-aging, then perhaps, it will be the real progress of women.
Last year, there was one called"Xiangfeng Cultural Festival"The organization of the event sparked outrage. The reason is that in a recent comic, they nakedly made Yoshiko Kawashima a superheroine. In them, Cixi was even promoted as a pioneer in saving China and emancipating women.
It has repeatedly flaunted the banner of "justifying Cixi's name" and touted Cixi as "the first woman with the spirit of the rule of law in modern Chinese history". In this account, Cixi is a female hero, a progressive life, and a ...... of "her power".And in order to further brag about Cixi and create a "feminist pioneer" character, they also drew a series of cartoons of Cixi. In the comics, Cixi reads Lu Xun's book.
And such a sinister intention was supported by the US Consulate in Shanghai. Not only that, but this Xiangfeng Cultural Festival is also a frequent visitor to the German Embassy, and each event is supported and certified by many international organizations. They call these so-called "women's independence" and "feminist movements" that incite the antagonism between men and women and create gender contradictions: light up orange.
Trying to take the first step in awakening the hater in this way.
You look at these three things, some are for traffic, some are for the box office, and some are for rights. They are all high-sounding and striving to create a "world where women are free from discrimination".
However, hard work is not to shout slogans, let alone deliberately create antagonism, it must be a world where women can participate in labor production on an equal footing, and the rights and interests of workers are more fairly protected.
The Internet is the era of fast food, and there are hundreds of opinions contending, and they know that the audience wants emotional resonance. Therefore, they used their best way to tailor some topics for us: such as discussing emotions or marital relationships, such as discussing explicit male rights, or women's rights in all plants, on the one hand, advocating women's economic and personality independence, and on the other hand, unlocking the emotions buried in the hearts of the audience and igniting it.
As you can see, they have the ability to control their emotions and create opposing contradictions, and at any time, they have no shortage of puppets who are being raised.