Entertainment
The battle for cross talk: a contest between tradition and innovation.
Introduction: The controversy caused by the cross talk conference.
In the Chinese cross talk world, a fierce debate is quietly heating up. The behind-the-scenes drama of the 5th Cross Talk Conference, the battle between mainstream cross talk and non-mainstream cross talk, has become the focus of heated discussions inside and outside the cultural circle。This dispute not only reflects the current state of cross talk art, but also involves the dispute between tradition and innovation. This article will deeply analyze the root causes of this controversy, evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the two parties, and ** the future development path of cross talk art.
i.The heart of the controversy.
a.The opposition between mainstream cross talk and non-mainstream cross talk.
b.sarcastically called "non-mainstream cross talk" as "tofu scum cross talk".
c.Mainstream cross talk is jokingly called "confidential cross talk".
The core of the controversy at the cross talk conference revolves around the differences between mainstream cross talk and non-mainstream cross talk. Mainstream cross talk has been questioned because of its confidential performances, while non-mainstream cross talk has been ridiculed as "tofu scum cross talk". This argument has sparked a wide range of discussions, prompting deep reflection on the relationship between traditional crosstalk and contemporary innovation.
ii.The focus of the controversy.
a.Netizens' comments on the cross talk conference.
b.* Criticism of plagiarism of "non-mainstream cross talk".
c.The secrecy of mainstream cross talk has caused dissatisfaction.
Netizens' comments on the cross talk conference were full of negative emotions, mainly focusing on the quality of the program, the degree of innovation, and the performance skills of the actors. ** Criticism of plagiarized online memes in "non-mainstream cross talk" has caused widespread resonance, while mainstream cross talk has caused dissatisfaction among viewers because of its secrecy practices. These focus questions reveal the dilemma between inheritance and innovation in the art of cross talk.
iii.The dilemma of the cross talk world.
a.The mainstream cross talk has a low reputation and strives to cater to the "down-to-earth".
b.The popularity of "non-mainstream cross talk" has declined, and the improvement of cultural quality has led to the loss of audiences.
The cross talk industry is facing a dilemma, although mainstream cross talk focuses on high culture, it has low popularity, while the popularity of non-mainstream cross talk has declined and the audience has lost. The integration between traditional culture and the tastes of modern audiences has become a major challenge for the art of cross talk.
iv.The pros and cons of both sides.
a.Mainstream cross talk is elegant and cultured, but it is not well-known.
b."Non-mainstream cross talk" is relatively vulgar and popular, but it is well-known among the masses.
It is difficult to judge which side is better than mainstream cross talk. Mainstream cross talk emphasizes elegance and culture, but it is less well-known, while non-mainstream cross talk, although it is more well-known among the masses, faces negative evaluations with low taste. This comparison of advantages and disadvantages shows that there is a balance dilemma between the two sides in the art of cross talk.
v.The root of the struggle.
a.The mainstream cross talk led by Jiang Kun was blamed.
b.Non-governmental organizations such as Deyun Club have made great contributions to the art of cross talk.
c.Folk cross talk is labeled as the "three vulgar arts".
The mainstream cross talk led by Jiang Kun has sparked criticism for his remarks, while civil society groups like Deyun Club have made great contributions to the art of cross talk. However, the negative impression of folk cross talk as "three vulgar arts" makes cross talk art more challenging.
vi.The future of cross talk.
a.Mainstream cross talk strives to be down-to-earth, but the effect is weak.
b."Non-mainstream cross talk" has lost its mass base due to cultural sublimation.
c.The form of live cross talk proposed by Cao Yunjin has achieved certain success
d.Cao Yunjin**'s attempt to tour.
The future of cross talk art is full of uncertainties. Mainstream cross talk strives to cater to contemporary audiences, but the effect is weak; Non-mainstream cross talk has lost its mass base due to cultural sublimation. Cao Yunjin's live broadcast cross talk form has achieved some success, and he has tried to tour offline, which shows the possibilities of cross talk art in the process of trying to innovate
vii.Innovation and joint efforts.
a.To have a bright future for cross talk, we need to work together.
b.It is not advisable to favor one side over the other, but to learn from each other's strengths.
c.Disputes over mainstream cross talk and "non-mainstream cross talk" are a waste of time.
For the art of cross talk to have a bright future, it needs the joint efforts of all parties. should not take sides over one side, but learn from each other's strengths and weaknesses to jointly promote the development of cross talk art. Disputes and accusations are just a waste of time, and everyone should think about the future path of cross talk together.
viii.Cao Yunjin's Attempts and Reflections.
a.The success and controversy of live cross talk.
b.Cao Yunjin fights against ** pressure.
c.A new attempt at offline touring.
Cao Yunjin, as a representative of mainstream cross talk, proposed a new form of live cross talk. Although it has succeeded in making a certain breakthrough, it has also faced the most controversial situation。He not only resolutely resisted doubts, but also tried offline tours, opening up new possibilities for the development of cross talk art.
ix.The path of innovation: preserving tradition and embracing contemporary.
a.The charm and cultural value of traditional cross talk.
b.The changing tastes of contemporary audiences.
c.The viability of the path to innovation.
In the face of the contradiction between the tradition of cross talk and the taste of contemporary audiences, we need to retain the charm and cultural value of traditional cross talk, and at the same time embrace innovation and embrace the contemporary. The path to innovation is doable, but it requires a concerted effort to find a balance.
x.Conclusion:
In the battle of cross talk, the wrestling between tradition and innovation is becoming more and more intense. How to find a balance between the inheritance and development of cross talk art is a challenge that contemporary cross talk practitioners and enthusiasts need to face together. The future of cross talk requires not only innovation, but also the joint efforts of all parties to ensure that this traditional art can still shine in the contemporary era. In the debate, we may be able to find a new direction for the development of cross talk art and create a brighter tomorrow for this ancient and charming performing art.