Mo Yan was sued for a follow up claim of 1.5 billion, and crowdfunding litigation fees of 7.5 millio

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-03-08

Not long ago, there was a very eye-catching hype, Mo Yan, the Nobel laureate, was accused of beautifying the Japanese army invading China and belittling the Chinese people. Such a bombshell accusation has caused an uproar in all walks of life, and everyone is talking about it, and a court war seems inevitable. However, as the case progresses, a shocking crowdfunding operation pushes the incident to a whole new ......

1. The literary giant Mo Yan encountered a turmoil.

In the long history of contemporary Chinese literature, Mo Yan's name is like a bright star, dazzling and dazzling. However, this once glorious literary giant is now caught in a farcical turmoil. It is reported that his works "Red Sorghum Family" and "Plump Breasts and Fat Buttocks" were accused of beautifying the Japanese army invading China and belittling the Chinese people. This accusation is like a bombshell, which shook the entire literary world and sparked widespread controversy and questioning.

Behind this accusation is a report from an Internet celebrity named Xiaohong. Xiaohong is an internet celebrity with more than 200,000 followers who has made a name for himself with his sharp remarks and sharp opinions. His actions pushed the storm to a climax, and the amount of compensation he demanded was even more staggering - 1.5 billion yuan! This number is simply unbelievable and makes the whole incident even more confusing.

Second, the crowdfunding action has aroused heated discussions in the society.

However, what is even more surprising is that in order to pay up to 7.5 million yuan in litigation costs, Xiaohong actually launched a crowdfunding campaign. This move sparked heated discussions from all walks of life, with some praising Xiaohong's courage and justice, believing that he was defending the dignity and honor of the country; While others criticized his actions as a violation of freedom of expression and an abuse of legal resources.

On social networks, supporters and opponents are hotly debated. Some people believe that Mo Yan's works do have the problem of beautifying the Japanese army that invaded China, and should be punished by law; Others believe that it is simply an expression of free speech and should not be subject to too much interference and restrictions.

In the comment section, supporters and opponents have their own opinions and argue endlessly. Some people believe that Mo Yan's works are a true reflection of history and should not be subject to too much interference and criticism; Others believe that Mo Yan's work has seriously hurt the feelings of the Chinese people and should be duly sanctioned and condemned.

3. My views and evaluations.

Personally, I have a neutral stance on this turmoil. I believe that freedom of speech is a fundamental right of every citizen, but that does not mean that it is okay to insult and belittle others at will. As a literary giant, Mo Yan should be responsible for his own works and should not challenge the bottom line of society at will.

However, I don't agree with Xiaohong's approach either. He launched groundless accusations and attacks against Mo Yan on the grounds of personal grievances, which is not only a challenge to freedom of speech, but also a violation of the spirit of the law. The huge compensation of 1.5 billion yuan he demanded is simply ridiculous and completely inconsistent with facts and logic.

It seems to me that the truth behind this turmoil may be more complex than we think. Whether there is a problem with Mo Yan's works, ** If there is a problem, it should be up to the state to decide. Other social groups and individuals should not be groundlessly accused and attacked. We should treat this matter with a rational and objective attitude, and not be confused by superficial phenomena, let alone swayed by personal emotions.

Finally, I hope that this turmoil will subside as soon as possible and the literary world will be able to return to the normal track. Freedom of speech is a fundamental right for everyone, but that doesn't mean it's okay to injure and attack others with all that they want. I believe that only on the basis of rationality and objectivity can we find the truth and truly achieve social progress and development.

Disclaimer) The article describes the process, **all** on the Internet, this article aims to advocate positive social energy, no vulgarity and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact.

Related Pages