Will the United States send troops to war with Russia for the sake of Ukraine?
Now the US White House says no, and the US Secretary of Defense says it will. Which one to listen to? A country's reaction is the same as a person's reaction, and subconscious words and deeds speak for themselves. When Macron said that NATO might send troops, the White House immediately came out and issued a statement that the opposition soldiers were subconsciously speaking. And what the US Secretary of Defense said was more to force the House of Representatives to comply.
In fact, the United States is not guilty of going to war with Russia for Ukraine at all. Ukraine is not a core interest of the United States, at best it is a tool at hand. Since the unfavorable situation on the battlefield in Ukraine, the attitude of the United States towards Ukraine and the attitude of the US Congress speak for itself. They went from unhesitating support at the beginning, to slow down and slow support, and now more verbal promises, and the aid bill simply cannot be passed.
Now the entire NATO is constantly intimidating Russia behind Ukraine with the United States, and the most panicked are the three Baltic countries, as well as the European countries behind! And the United States is the most relaxed one, because as long as the United States does not directly attack Russia, then Russia will not run to attack the United States mainland. Even if Alaska was hit, it was quite desolate except for a few military bases, and the United States had basically not developed Alaska after buying land. It is nothing more than the creation of military bases and the exploitation of available resources.
For the United States, even if Ukraine is defeated, the Russian army will be overwhelmed. The United States will also choose a new tool man to consume Russia. Poland, for example. It is even said that if the United States does not need to send troops, then it is not impossible to use the entire European NATO countries to consume Russia.
Both the United States and European countries can actually foresee a terrible fact, that is, now NATO countries combined, all kinds of conventions, including the navy, land and air force, can launch a comprehensive counterattack against Russia. But Russia has said it many times that if Russia loses, the world loses. Many people scoff at Russia's frequent talk about nuclear **! But the number of times nuclear ** is really used is only that twice. The greatest significance of its existence is deterrence, and Russia is just repeatedly reminding NATO.
**10,000 Fans Incentive Plan
It can be seen from Russia's past statements that Russia's purpose is the four eastern regions of Ukraine, and he neither wants the whole of Ukraine nor wants a war with NATO. All his goals now are to subdue Ukraine, put Ukraine at the negotiating table, and take away the four eastern regions of Ukraine to end the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. In this situation, there is still a large amount of territory in western Ukraine that can be used as a buffer zone between Russia and NATO, but the agreement must be Ukraine's permanent neutrality.
If Ukraine does not agree, then Russia will inevitably advance further to feed the war with war. He cannot afford to give the United States and the West a breather and arm Ukraine once again. So, Russia will not give Ukraine another chance to conclude something like the Minsk agreements! It must demilitarize Ukraine or neutralize it permanently.
As for Russia's relations with Europe, after it looks eastward, Europe doesn't want it!