Let's talk about the study report of the village chief, and by the way, analyze the follow-up trend.
Let's talk about the conclusion first, the idea of leaving the scene in the short term said at noon today is correct, why do you say that, it is the content of this press conference mentioned:
The meaning behind this article should be clear, why should we crack down? The note must have mastered some of them. For example, it is impossible to say that there are no thieves in the whole village, and we shout slogans saying that we must crack down on thieves, right? Why do you say strict? When to say strict? You savor it.
Therefore, in the follow-up actions, there will be a series of consequences of this crackdown, so before this result comes out, no one knows how strict this time will be and to what extent. Besides, how much damage will it do when the fight is over? If it hits the ** in the hands of the leek, is it ......
Right, a gentleman does not stand under a dangerous wall.
Therefore, in the short term, it is mainly to avoid risks, which is what it means, at least don't splash blood.
This is definitely good in the medium term, but it mainly depends on the intensity of implementation, whether it is verbal implementation or specific actions, just such a sentence, I am afraid it is not enough, there needs to be more practical actions.
This sentence is also based on the intensity of implementation, because there are no specific details, if the number of IPOs this year is ...... more than last yearAh, of course ......Let's hope it's just a ......Right?
This is also a long-term good, many financial people have mentioned that the plate is still so big, there are still so many funds, but the listed companies are getting faster and faster, only in and out, the funds are diluted, how can there be **? How can we ensure that more than 5,000 companies are good companies?
Therefore, there must be strict delisting, and the delisted enterprises must be allowed to leave their money to shareholders, so as to be linked to the protection of small and medium-sized investors. Of course, this is also to see what kind of system comes out of the time. I hope it can really correspond to the strict creation of fake fraud.
We have a lot of leeks that just want the word fairness, why can some people t+0, while most people can only t+1? If this matter is not clear, I am afraid it will hurt the hearts of the vast majority of people. If it can be made clear (at least not yet), of course, it should also be seen as a benefit.
It should be the time when it was 2600 points a year ago, and it is estimated that this method will not be used if it is not at 2600 points, right?
Well, that's all for the study report, and the corresponding trend analysis has also been written, and this is just my thoughts and interpretations, do you have any good ideas to share? Feel free to share in the comment section.